Invalidity dossier

US 5463209

Point-of-sale product information dissemination arrangement and method

Current assignee: Symbol Technologies LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 10:35:11 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US5463209A

Title: Point-of-sale product information dissemination arrangement and method

Patent number / application: US5463209A; application US08/384,607, filed 1995‑02‑03; granted/publication date 1995‑10‑31. Priority date listed as 1993‑11‑29 (noted as an assumption, not a legal conclusion). Status listed as "Expired ‑ Fee Related," with anticipated expiration 2013‑11‑29.

Inventors / assignee: Inventors Jack Figh and Robert V. Cuddihy, Jr.; original assignee HMG Worldwide In Store Marketing Inc. The source's "current assignee" listing names Symbol Technologies LLC and PNC Bank NA, though Google Patents itself cautions such listed assignees may be inaccurate and that it performs no legal analysis. Per the operating rules, I do not analyze the listed reassignments or ownership transfers.

Purpose: The patent addresses disseminating product information at the point of sale. It critiques prior approaches—infomercials (costly, limited audience, easy to postpone) and in-store video displays (store-selected rather than customer-selected product, endless-loop programming rarely seen in proper sequence, and no private viewing).

Plain-language scope: An arrangement at a "vending location" (e.g., a shelf, aisle, or store) lets a customer request information about a chosen product from a group offered for sale. A carrier—such as a product label bearing the product's SKU/bar code—carries an optically distinguishable marking uniquely identifying the product type. An entry device, advantageously an optical scanner, reads the marking and generates an addressing signal. That signal directs retrieval of stored product-related data from a corresponding portion of a storage medium (e.g., video/laser disk or ROM player, or memory chip), producing driving signals fed to a presentation device (e.g., a television/monitor, possibly with sound). The entry and presentation devices sit at the vending location; the processing and storage components may but preferably need not be remote.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5463209](/patent/US5463209)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied text is explicitly excerpted and omits claims, the full description, drawing details, and most prior-art discussion. Therefore it does not establish the exact claim scope, all disclosed embodiments, specific cited references, or file-history details.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:33:16 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5463209. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.