Invalidity dossier

US 5420606

Instant electronic coupon verification system

Current assignee: Klever Marketing Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 11:40:54 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US5420606A

Title: Instant electronic coupon verification system

Patent number: US5420606A | Application number: US08/123,192

Inventors: Paul G. Begum; Mark A. Geiger

Assignee of record (as supplied): Original assignee KLEVER-KART Inc (also styled KLEVER-KART, INC.); current assignee listed as Klever Marketing Inc. A later reassignment entry (2009-09-28) records Klever-Kart, Inc. to Klever Marketing, Inc.

Key dates: Priority/filing date 1993-09-20; publication/grant date 1995-05-30; anticipated expiration 2013-09-20; status "Expired - Lifetime."

Purpose: The invention "relates to an electronic paperless couponing system that allows an in-store, electronic coupon to be issued and redeemed without the necessity of putting the coupon on paper or other tangible medium." It addresses coupon fraud/manipulation by correlating a displayed redemption coupon with an actual purchase: "It would be extremely desirable... if a redemption coupon presented to a potential purchaser was directly correlated with the purchase of an item that is the subject of the coupon."

Plain-language scope (from the supplied excerpt): A communication unit with a display screen shows a graphic promotional coupon; a user control lets the shopper select the displayed coupon; a transmission circuit communicates the selection at checkout so the discount is applied when the subject item is purchased. The system uses standard bar code data and product identification numbers, coordinating coupon issuance with product sales accounting and existing store/manufacturer accounting systems. Coupon selection and purchased item are recorded to provide an audit trail confirming the promotion was reviewed and the discounted item purchased. It may be combined with, or independent of, the point-of-purchase promotional system of the referenced application "Automated Shopping Cart Handle," U.S. Ser. No. 08/090,285, filed Jul. 12, 1993.

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not supply the claims, full specification, or drawings; the complete definition of claim scope; or the full text of the incorporated application. It states no findings on validity or prior art.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5420606](/patent/US5420606)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:32:29 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5420606. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.