Invalidity dossier
US 5173906
Built-in self test for integrated circuits
Current assignee: International Business Machines Corp
Added 9/21/2026, 12:39:49 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview: US5173906A — "Built-in Self Test for Integrated Circuits"
Bibliographic data (as supplied): US Patent 5,173,906 A; application US07/576,646; filed 1990-08-31; priority date 1990-08-31; granted/publication date 1992-12-22; inventor(s) Jeffrey H. Dreibelbis, Erik L. Hedberg, and John G. Petrovick, Jr.; assigned to International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), a corp. of NY. Related priorities listed: EP0472818B1 and JP3190809A/JPH06342040A (both 1991-05-07 foreign filings). Status listed as "Expired – Lifetime" (anticipated expiration 2010-08-31). Classifications include G11C29/12 (BIST arrangements) and G06F11/27 (built-in tests).
Purpose and subject matter: The invention concerns built-in self test (BIST) arrangements fabricated on the integrated circuit chip itself, particularly for testing embedded memory circuits such as SRAMs and DRAMs that are not directly accessible from primary input/output pins. The excerpt states that prior BIST circuits for embedded memories "have heretofore been limited to the provision of deterministic patterns by way of memory arrays that take large amounts of chip area, which is undesirable." The disclosed approach provides an on-chip self-test arrangement including a data pattern generator on the same chip as the VLSI circuit for generating predetermined deterministic test data applied to the circuit's data inputs, a control signal generator for control signals enabling operation on that test data, and a generator for producing expected data, with expected data compared against actual data to produce a pass/fail signal.
Additional stated scope: A further aspect stores the location within the VLSI circuit where a failure occurred, for later use in failure analysis or activation of duplicative logic or memory circuitry. The excerpt also notes test circuitry manufactured directly on chip permitting external testers to invoke a variety of array tests without chip redesign.
What the excerpt does not establish: The excerpt is expressly partial ("Excerpt only"), so claim text is unavailable. It does not reproduce the claims, specification, figures, or references, and does not establish the actual inventive scope, claim limitations, prosecution history, validity, or any post-grant proceedings.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5173906](/patent/US5173906)/en
Generated 10/1/2026, 10:01:01 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5173906. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.