Invalidity dossier

US 4220673

Low-temperature steam desorbate process for improved instant tea

Current assignee: Procter and Gamble Co

Added 9/23/2026, 10:15:14 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 4,220,673 A

Title: Low-temperature steam desorbate process for improved instant tea
Patent number: US 4,220,673 A
Inventor: Rudolf G. K. Strobel
Assignee: Procter and Gamble Co (original and current assignee as listed)
Application number: US05/936,951
Priority/filing date: 1978-08-25
Publication (grant) date: 1980-09-02
Legal status (as listed): Expired – Lifetime; anticipated expiration 1998-08-25
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4220673/en

Purpose. The patent addresses instant tea quality. Its stated objects are to upgrade taste and flavor of instant teas, provide a good-looking cup that tastes like freshly brewed tea but is less bitter and less astringent, and provide instants that are cold-water soluble with solution stability for iced tea beverages.

Plain-language scope. The process treats a bed of dry ground tea leaves. A small upper portion of the bed is pre-wetted and pre-swelled with steam (optionally with a little water) — the excerpt states this step is "critical." The bed is held under vacuum at low temperature (preferably below 55° C.) while water and steam are applied, and the desorbed aqueous tea extract is condensed in a cold trap, preferably trapping an aroma/flavor fraction as frost. Preferred embodiments include pre-wetting about 1–30% (most preferably 10–25%) of the bed; absolute pressure of about 13–400 mbar (more preferably 25–300 mbar); cold trap below about 10° C., more preferably below −60° C.; a draw-off ratio of about 0.9:1 to 2.5:1; and pulsed CO₂ during extraction to increase yields. The initial extract is dried to a stable cool-water-soluble instant tea. Cold hard-water solubility is said to be improved by process-water additives: higher-chain polyphosphates (e.g., Glass H® from FMC), sulfites/bisulfites (preferably sodium bisulfite), or low-calcium lambda-carrageenan. An apparatus with column, false bottom, retaining layer, nozzle system, and condenser inlet warmer is described.

What the excerpt does not establish. It does not report claim text, claim count, or claim scope; does not establish validity, enforceability, or freedom to operate; does not report litigation or ownership transfers; and gives no complete prior-art analysis — it mentions U.S. Pat. No. 4,004,038 (Wickremasinghe) and general sodium bisulfite use only. The excerpt is truncated, so some disclosure is missing.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:33:38 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4220673. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.