Invalidity dossier

US 185628

Improvement in combined handle-plate and escutcheon for doors

Added 9/23/2026, 2:29:39 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 185,628

Title: Improvement in Combined Handle-Plate and Escutcheon for Doors

Patentee: John Collins, of Darlington, township of Hohokus, county of Bergen, New Jersey.

Assignee: Hopkins & Dickinson Manufacturing Company.

Dates: Application filed October 18, 1876; Letters Patent dated December 26, 1876. Google Patents lists the prior-art date and publication date as 1876-12-26, status "Expired – Lifetime," with anticipated expiration 1893-12-26.

Purpose: The invention addresses door hardware in which the handle-plate (A) and the keyhole escutcheon-plate (B) are made as separate pieces rather than as one integral plate or as wholly independent plates. The two plates are formed so they can be attached to a door in a way that unites them and largely conceals the line of union between them. The stated background notes that handle-plates had been used with separate keyhole plates, and that handle-plates in one piece with an escutcheon-plate had also been used.

Plain-language scope: The handle-plate has a projection (c) in the plane of the plate with a hole (d) through it; the escutcheon-plate has a cavity (6) on its back containing a circular elevation (f) sized to enter hole (d), with a screw hole through f. When assembled, projection c fits into cavity 6 and encircles f, and a screw through both plates secures them at that part of the door. Raised ornamentation on each plate (a, b) appears nearly continuous. The interlocking fit fixes the plates relative to one another—preventing independent up, down, or sidewise movement—and adds strength and stiffness. The patent also describes a method of installation: screw the handle-plate to the door, place the escutcheon-plate, mark the keyhole, remove the escutcheon-plate to cut the keyhole, then replace it in the same position.

Claim: "The combination of a handle-plate and escutcheon-plate constructed with interlocking elevations and depressions formed in the plates, substantially as and for the purposes herein described."

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US185628](/patent/US185628)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full drawings (Figs. 1–4 are referenced but not reproduced in the text), a complete claims set beyond the single quoted claim, prosecution history, or the separate design application mentioned ("The design shown is the subject of a separate application for design patent"). It also does not establish litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior-art details, and the text contains apparent OCR garbling (e.g., "cavity 0," "concealingof") that cannot be reliably corrected from the excerpt alone.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:15 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 185628. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.