Invalidity dossier

US 1557270

Vacuum cup for washing machines

Current assignee: Individual

Added 9/23/2026, 6:56:49 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 1557270 A

Title: Vacuum cup for washing machines
Inventor: William E. Pinckney, of Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon, a US citizen
Assignee (per source): Individual (original assignee: Individual)
Application No.: US 748,920
Filing / Priority Date: November 10, 1924
Publication (Grant) Date: October 13, 1925
Anticipated Expiration: October 13, 1942; legal status listed as "Expired – Lifetime"
Classification: D06F 15/00 — washing machines having beating, rubbing or squeezing means in receptacles stationary for washing purposes
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US1557270/en

Purpose (from the specification): To provide an exceedingly simple and efficient type of pounder usable in square or rectangular containers without ratcheting devices or means for shifting the position of the clothes; to construct the cups so that practically every portion of the container is within reach of their pounding action; and to adapt the pounder for use with the washing machine described in the inventor's companion application, Serial No. 748,921.

Plain-language scope: The device sits in the lower part of a rectangular water container (bottom 10, sides 11 and 12). A tubular guide 13 on the bottom slidably mounts a plunger 14. Crossed arms 16 and 17 are secured across the plunger's upper end 15, carrying T-shaped cups 18 and longitudinal cups 19 fastened by short rods 20. In use, clothes and water go in and the plunger is reciprocated by an actuating device (not shown). The cup shapes leave sufficient area between cups for water and clothes displacement and suds formation, eliminating special mechanisms to bring all clothes under the pounders.

Claim 1 (sole claim): The combination of a rectangular water container having a vertical plunger mounted near the middle of its bottom; a pair of crossed arms attached to the upper end of said plunger; a pair of T-shaped cups at the opposite ends of one pair of arms; and a pair of longitudinal cups on the opposite ends of the remaining pair of arms, said longitudinal cups occupying space between said T-shaped cups, all of said cups occupying the major portion of the area of said water container.

What this excerpt does not establish: The companion application Serial No. 748,921 is identified but its text is not supplied. The actuating device, materials, cup dimensions, and drawings' full content are not described beyond the cited figures. The excerpt provides no information on assignments, litigation, validity, or prior art beyond a list of "similar documents." Legal status is stated by the source as an assumption, not a legal conclusion.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:42:25 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 1557270. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.