Invalidity dossier

US 140327

Improvement in whiffletrees

Added 9/23/2026, 12:15:54 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 140,327 — Improvement in Whiffletrees

Title: Improvement in Whiffletrees
Patent No.: US 140,327
Inventor: Bailey S. Wescott, of Corning, Steuben County, New York
Assignee/Interests: Wescott assigned one-half his right to Loraine Dodge, of the same place
Application filed: April 26, 1873
Granted/Published: June 24, 1873
Legal status (as listed): Expired — Lifetime
Classification: B62C5/00 (Draught assemblies)
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US140327](/patent/US140327)/en

Purpose. The invention relates to whiffletrees (also called eveners or singletrees) and aims to lessen the shock on horses' shoulders during draft over rough roads or when striking an obstruction, thereby improving the comfort, health, and usefulness of draft animals.

Plain-language scope. A wooden whiffletree shaft (A) has two bored holes (b b) lined with wear-preventing tubes (c c). Plates (d d) are fastened to the front and back faces to secure and steady the working staple. The staple (e) is an enclosed loop or ring (g) whose rear edge (h) bears against the face of plate d, and two threaded arms (k) sized to pass within the tubes. Spiral springs (s) sit on the arms; nuts (m) engage the threads. In assembly, plate d′ goes on the arms, springs are slipped on, and nuts are tightened until the staple no longer rattles against the plate and proper tension is obtained; the assembly is then inserted through the tubes and the second plate fastened to the face of the tree. The sole claim covers the combination of the staple with loop g and threaded arms k, adjustable nuts m, springs s, and removable stop-plate d′, substantially as specified.

What the excerpt does not establish. It does not report any actual litigation, ownership transfer beyond the stated one-half assignment, validity determination, or prior-art comparison. The legal-status entry is expressly an assumption, not a legal conclusion. No drawing images or figure content beyond the three described views are reproduced here.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:44 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 140327. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.