Patent 12250564

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Proceedings on file (1)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Unified Patents

1 active
Trial Instituted
Filed
Jul 21, 2025
Last modified
Jun 11, 2026
Petitioner
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.
Inventor
Sai C. Manapragada

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

A single AIA trial proceeding, PGR2025-00069, has been filed against US patent 12250564. This proceeding is currently in the "Trial Instituted" phase. Given the early stage of the proceeding, no claims have been invalidated or sustained yet. Therefore, the patent claims remain untested in a final written decision, and the defensive posture for a defendant is that the patent is currently subject to an active Post-Grant Review.


PGR2025-00069 — [[[Samsung Electronics Co.](/litigations/by-defendant/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.), Ltd.](/litigations/by-plaintiff/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.%2C%20Ltd.) et al.](/litigations/by-plaintiff/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.%2C%20Ltd.%20et%20al.) v. Xifi Networks R and D Inc

  • Type: Post-Grant Review (PGR)
  • Filed: 2025-07-21
  • Status: Trial Instituted. The Board has determined that the petition demonstrated a reasonable likelihood that at least one claim is unpatentable, and the trial is currently ongoing.
  • Judge panel: Information regarding the specific judge panel is not publicly available from the provided data or readily ascertainable through a general search at this stage.
  • Petition grounds: Specific details on which claims were challenged, the prior art references cited, and the statutory bases (§ 102 / § 103 / § 112) for the challenge in PGR2025-00069 are not publicly available from the provided data.
  • Institution decision: The trial was instituted. The specific date of institution and the panel's detailed reasoning are not explicitly provided in the available data but would typically be contained in the institution decision document itself.
  • Final Written Decision (if issued): A Final Written Decision has not yet been issued for PGR2025-00069. The proceeding was filed on 2025-07-21 and the trial instituted, meaning a final decision is generally due within one year of institution, likely around July 2026.
  • Settlement / termination: There is no public record of a settlement or termination for this proceeding as of the current date.
  • Appeal: No appeal to the Federal Circuit has occurred, as a Final Written Decision has not yet been issued.
  • Defensive value: This proceeding indicates that at least one claim of US12250564 is under active review for patentability by the PTAB. A defendant should monitor the progress of this PGR closely, as an unfavorable outcome for the patent owner could significantly impact any assertion of the patent.

Strategic summary

Currently, all claims of US patent 12250564 are UNTESTED in a Final Written Decision, as the single PGR proceeding, PGR2025-00069, is still active in the "Trial Instituted" phase. This means no claims have been definitively canceled or sustained by the PTAB yet.

Regarding the estoppel landscape, since PGR2025-00069 is ongoing and no Final Written Decision has been rendered, the estoppel provisions of § 315(e)(2) for this particular proceeding are not yet in effect. Once a Final Written Decision is issued, the petitioner (Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al., and any privy) would be barred from asserting in other proceedings that claims found patentable in the PGR are invalid on any ground raised or that reasonably could have been raised during the PGR. For other potential defendants, the prior-art grounds and statutory bases not addressed or raised in PGR2025-00069 (or those that were raised but found not to render claims unpatentable) would theoretically still be available in a separate challenge, assuming no privity with Samsung.

A notable pattern signal is that the petitioner is "Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.", which can represent a significant entity challenging the patent. The Google Patents page for US12250564 also mentions "Unified Patents PTAB Data" in relation to this PGR, suggesting Unified Patents may be involved in tracking or supporting the challenge, which is common for defensive aggregators.

Recommended next steps

  • For any defendant facing assertion of US12250564, it is critical to monitor the ongoing PGR2025-00069 proceeding. The PTAB typically issues an institution decision and then proceeds to a Final Written Decision within one year of institution. The last modification date was 2026-04-06. The Final Written Decision for PGR2025-00069 is anticipated around July 2026, assuming the trial began shortly after its filing date of 2025-07-21.
  • Once the Final Written Decision is issued, review it thoroughly to determine which, if any, claims have been invalidated. If claims asserted against you are canceled, this significantly weakens the patent owner's position.
  • Access to the public record of the proceeding can be found on the USPTO PTAB End-to-End system (E2E) by searching for "PGR2025-00069".
  • The absence of any other PTAB activity (IPRs, CBMs) beyond this single PGR implies that, for now, the patent's claims have not undergone extensive post-grant review, but this could change if the patent continues to be asserted or if additional art is discovered.

US12250564B2 - Method and apparatus for processing bandwidth intensive data streams using virtual media access control and physical layers - Google Patents. https://patents.google.com/patent/US12250564/en
PTAB E2E Public Search. https://e2e.uspto.gov/ptab/ (Search "PGR2025-00069" to find specific documents such as the institution decision and, eventually, the final written decision.)## Proceedings overview

A single AIA trial proceeding, PGR2025-00069, has been filed against US patent 12250564. This proceeding is currently in the "Trial Instituted" phase. Given the early stage of the proceeding, no claims have been invalidated or sustained yet. Therefore, the patent claims remain untested in a final written decision, and the defensive posture for a defendant is that the patent is currently subject to an active Post-Grant Review.


PGR2025-00069 — Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v. Xifi Networks R and D Inc

  • Type: Post-Grant Review (PGR)
  • Filed: 2025-07-21
  • Status: Trial Instituted. The Board has determined that the petition demonstrated a reasonable likelihood that at least one claim is unpatentable, and the trial is currently ongoing.
  • Judge panel: Information regarding the specific judge panel is not publicly available from the provided data or readily ascertainable through a general search at this stage.
  • Petition grounds: Specific details on which claims were challenged, the prior art references cited, and the statutory bases (§ 102 / § 103 / § 112) for the challenge in PGR2025-00069 are not publicly available from the provided data.
  • Institution decision: The trial was instituted. The specific date of institution and the panel's detailed reasoning are not explicitly provided in the available data but would typically be contained in the institution decision document itself.
  • Final Written Decision (if issued): A Final Written Decision has not yet been issued for PGR2025-00069. The proceeding was filed on 2025-07-21 and the trial instituted, meaning a final decision is generally due within one year of institution, likely around July 2026.
  • Settlement / termination: There is no public record of a settlement or termination for this proceeding as of the current date.
  • Appeal: No appeal to the Federal Circuit has occurred, as a Final Written Decision has not yet been issued.
  • Defensive value: This proceeding indicates that at least one claim of US12250564 is under active review for patentability by the PTAB. A defendant should monitor the progress of this PGR closely, as an unfavorable outcome for the patent owner could significantly impact any assertion of the patent.

Strategic summary

Currently, all claims of US patent 12250564 are UNTESTED in a Final Written Decision, as the single PGR proceeding, PGR2025-00069, is still active in the "Trial Instituted" phase. This means no claims have been definitively canceled or sustained by the PTAB yet.

Regarding the estoppel landscape, since PGR2025-00069 is ongoing and no Final Written Decision has been rendered, the estoppel provisions of § 315(e)(2) for this particular proceeding are not yet in effect. Once a Final Written Decision is issued, the petitioner (Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al., and any privy) would be barred from asserting in other proceedings that claims found patentable in the PGR are invalid on any ground raised or that reasonably could have been raised during the PGR. For other potential defendants, the prior-art grounds and statutory bases not addressed or raised in PGR2025-00069 (or those that were raised but found not to render claims unpatentable) would theoretically still be available in a separate challenge, assuming no privity with Samsung.

A notable pattern signal is that the petitioner is "Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.", which can represent a significant entity challenging the patent. The Google Patents page for US12250564 also mentions "Unified Patents PTAB Data" in relation to this PGR, suggesting Unified Patents may be involved in tracking or supporting the challenge, which is common for defensive aggregators.

Recommended next steps

  • For any defendant facing assertion of US12250564, it is critical to monitor the ongoing PGR2025-00069 proceeding. The PTAB typically issues an institution decision and then proceeds to a Final Written Decision within one year of institution. The last modification date was 2026-04-06. The Final Written Decision for PGR2025-00069 is anticipated around July 2026, assuming the trial began shortly after its filing date of 2025-07-21.
  • Once the Final Written Decision is issued, review it thoroughly to determine which, if any, claims have been invalidated. If claims asserted against you are canceled, this significantly weakens the patent owner's position.
  • Access to the public record of the proceeding can be found on the USPTO PTAB End-to-End system (E2E) by searching for "PGR2025-00069".
  • The absence of any other PTAB activity (IPRs, CBMs) beyond this single PGR implies that, for now, the patent's claims have not undergone extensive post-grant review, but this could change if the patent continues to be asserted or if additional art is discovered.

US12250564B2 - Method and apparatus for processing bandwidth intensive data streams using virtual media access control and physical layers - Google Patents. https://patents.google.com/patent/US12250564/en
PTAB E2E Public Search. https://e2e.uspto.gov/ptab/ (Search "PGR2025-00069" to find specific documents such as the institution decision and, eventually, the final written decision.)

Generated 5/20/2026, 6:46:17 PM