- Filed
- Jun 4, 2025
- Last modified
- Jan 14, 2026
- Petitioner
- Orca Security Ltd.
- Inventor
- Amitai COHEN et al
Patent 12003529
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (1)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
One Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceeding has been filed against US12003529, which was terminated due to settlement. This means no claims of the patent have been invalidated or sustained by the PTAB, leaving the patent's validity largely untested by the IPR process.
IPR2025-01087 — Orca Security Ltd. v. Wiz Inc.
- Type: Inter Partes Review
- Filed: 2025-06-04
- Status: Terminated-Settled – The parties reached a settlement agreement and requested to terminate the proceeding.
- Judge panel: Not publicly available in the provided search results.
- Petition grounds: Specific claims challenged, prior art, and statutory basis are not publicly available from the provided search results.
- Institution decision: An institution decision was not rendered as the parties settled the dispute and filed a joint motion to terminate the proceeding on January 8, 2026.
- Final Written Decision: Not issued, as the proceeding was terminated due to settlement.
- Settlement / termination: The parties executed a settlement agreement resolving all disputes and were granted authorization to file a joint motion to terminate and a joint motion to keep the settlement agreement confidential on January 8, 2026. The specific terms of the settlement are confidential. The last modification date for the proceeding was 2026-01-14.
- Appeal: Not applicable, as no Final Written Decision was issued.
- Defensive value: This proceeding concluded without a PTAB decision on the merits, meaning the patent's claims were neither invalidated nor confirmed as patentable through this IPR. For a defendant, this means the patent has not been "hardened" by surviving an IPR challenge, but also that no claims have been canceled.
Strategic summary
Only one IPR proceeding, IPR2025-01087, has been filed against US12003529. This proceeding was terminated due to a confidential settlement between the petitioner, Orca Security Ltd., and the patent owner, Wiz Inc., before any institution decision or final written decision was issued. As such, all claims of US12003529 remain untested by the PTAB. There are no canceled, sustained, or unpatentable claims on record from PTAB proceedings.
Regarding estoppel, since IPR2025-01087 was terminated prior to institution, the statutory estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) do not apply. This means that Orca Security Ltd. (and its privies) would not be estopped from raising invalidity grounds in future litigation that they raised or reasonably could have raised in the IPR petition. For a defendant facing assertion of this patent today, all prior-art grounds remain available for challenge, as no PTAB trial has concluded with a final written decision.
There is no discernible pattern signal from this single settled proceeding. There have not been multiple IPRs filed on this patent, nor has the patent owner pursued PTAB appeals aggressively. There is no indication of a defensive aggregator like Unified Patents directly in this specific proceeding for US12003529, although Unified Patents does track PTAB cases in general.
Recommended next steps
Since there are no active PTAB proceedings and the sole filed IPR was settled before institution, there are no upcoming trial-stage milestones to monitor. The absence of PTAB activity is a notable signal; for a patent recently granted in June 2024, the filing of one IPR and its subsequent settlement suggests some early engagement but no definitive PTAB ruling on patentability. Defendants facing assertion of US12003529 would need to initiate their own IPRs if they wish to challenge the patent's validity before the PTAB.
Generated 5/16/2026, 12:49:04 PM