Invalidity dossier

US 112937

Improvement in traveling-trunks

Added 9/23/2026, 1:41:02 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 112,937

Title: Improvement in Traveling-Trunks
Inventor: John C. Locke, of Rochester, Monroe County, New York
Patent Number: US 112,937
Date of Patent: March 21, 1871
Assignee: None stated in the supplied text (no assignee named)
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US112937](/patent/US112937)/en

Purpose

The patent addresses fastening and propping mechanisms for traveling-trunks. It replaces ordinary leather straps and buckles used to hold the cover down, and ordinary flexible webbing or jointed elbow stays used to hold the cover up, with metal alternatives intended to be self-adjusting and more durable.

Plain-Language Scope

Two improvements are described:

  1. Spring-strap fastening. Two metal straps (hoop-iron, steel, or brass) are pivoted to the valance, their upper ends resting loosely in caps or escutcheons to allow lateral play. Their lower ends are dovetailed. Matching catches on the trunk body have wedging lugs spaced to receive and embrace the strap when it drops down. When the cover shuts, the strap rides over the lugs and locks automatically; an open space beneath the strap end allows a finger to raise and disengage it. The described benefit is that the strap has no break or slot, preserving its full tensile strength—unlike a hasp-eye or a slotted strap over a pin.

  2. Hinged stays. Thin metallic bands, narrower than the trunk boards, are hinged at their lower ends to the trunk body's end pieces. Their upper portions have a longitudinal slot with an offset bend at the top, through which a screw or pin passes into the cover's end piece. When the cover is raised, the pin slides up the slot and drops into the offset, making the band a rigid stay; the cover cannot fall until the stay is deliberately disengaged. When closed, the bands fold flat between body and cover.

Claims

  1. The spring-straps D D in combination with the catches G G, substantially as described.
  2. The pivoted or hinged stays H H with slots s s', arranged to lie flat between the body and cover ends when closed.

What the Excerpt Does Not Establish

The supplied text does not identify an assignee, does not state filing or priority dates (only the grant date), and does not address litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior art beyond the listed similar documents.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:56 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 112937. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.