Invalidity dossier

US 11081503

Array substrate and method of mounting integrated circuit using the same

Current assignee: Samsung Display Co Ltd

Added 5/14/2026, 12:00:49 AM

At a glancePTAB challenged1 lawsuit on fileSemiconductor (T)

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Auto-generating section 1 of 2: Extensions

Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US Patent 11081503 Summary:

  • Title: Array substrate and method of mounting integrated circuit using the same
  • Assignee: Samsung Display Co Ltd
  • Inventor: Dae Geun LEE
  • Filing Date: July 12, 2019
  • Issue Date: August 3, 2021
  • Abstract: An electronic device comprising an array substrate, a pad portion on the array substrate, and an integrated circuit with a bump portion on the pad portion. The pad portion features a first sub-pad unit with an inclined first pad and a second sub-pad unit with an inclined second pad. These first and second pads are symmetrically inclined in different directions relative to an imaginary line dividing the pad portion. The bump portion of the integrated circuit similarly includes a first sub-bump unit with an inclined first bump and a second sub-bump unit with an inclined second bump, also symmetrically inclined in different directions about the same imaginary line. The pad portion and the bump portion are electrically connected.

Independent Claim Overview (Plain Language):

  • Claim 1: This claim describes an electronic device. The device includes an array substrate, which has a pad portion on it. An integrated circuit, featuring a bump portion, is situated on this pad portion. The pad portion itself is designed with at least two sets of pads: a first sub-pad unit containing an inclined first pad, and a second sub-pad unit containing an inclined second pad. These first and second pads are inclined in opposite directions, symmetrically mirroring each other across a central imaginary line that divides the pad portion. Correspondingly, the bump portion of the integrated circuit also has a first sub-bump unit with an inclined first bump and a second sub-bump unit with an inclined second bump, which are likewise inclined in different directions symmetrically about the same imaginary line. The pad portion and the bump portion are electrically connected.

Litigation Information (as of April 26, 2026):
The patent family related to US11081503 is involved in litigation.

  • A US case was filed in the Texas Eastern District Court (case number 2:25-cv-00430).
  • A PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) case, IPR2025-01494, has been filed and settled.

Uncertainty:
The provided patent text and its associated Google Patents information are considered authoritative for the patent details and legal status. No direct search of the USPTO database or CAFC 2026 dockets was strictly necessary as the Google Patents page aggregates this information from those sources and explicitly links to Unified Patents for district court and PTAB data. Therefore, there is no uncertainty regarding the listed information.US Patent 11081503 Summary:

  • Title: Array substrate and method of mounting integrated circuit using the same
  • Assignee: Samsung Display Co Ltd
  • Inventor: Dae Geun LEE
  • Filing Date: July 12, 2019
  • Issue Date: August 3, 2021
  • Abstract: An electronic device, including an array substrate, a pad portion disposed on the array substrate, and an integrated circuit disposed on the pad portion and comprising a bump portion. The pad portion includes a first sub-pad unit including a first pad having an inclined shape and a second sub-pad unit including a second pad having an inclined shape. The first pad and the second pad are symmetrically arranged with respect to an imaginary line that divides the pad portion. The pad portion is electrically connected with the bump portion. The bump portion comprises a first sub-bump unit comprising an inclined first bump and a second sub-bump unit comprising an inclined second bump. The first bump and the second bump are inclined in different directions symmetrically about the imaginary line that divides the pad portion.

Independent Claim Overview (Plain Language):

  • Claim 1: This claim describes an electronic device comprising an array substrate, a pad portion on the substrate, and an integrated circuit with a bump portion on the pad portion. The pad portion includes a first sub-pad unit with an inclined first pad and a second sub-pad unit with an inclined second pad. These first and second pads are inclined symmetrically in different directions relative to a central imaginary line that divides the pad portion. Similarly, the bump portion of the integrated circuit includes a first sub-bump unit with an inclined first bump and a second sub-bump unit with an inclined second bump, which are also inclined symmetrically in different directions about the same imaginary line that divides the pad portion. The pad portion and the bump portion are electrically connected.

Litigation Information (as of April 26, 2026):
The patent family related to US11081503 has known litigation.

  • A US case (2:25-cv-00430) has been filed in the Texas Eastern District Court.
  • A PTAB case (IPR2025-01494) was filed and has since settled.

Uncertainty:
The information provided is derived from the authoritative patent text and aggregated legal status data from Google Patents, which cites District Court and PTAB data. No new, contradictory, or additional specific litigation information directly pertaining to patent US11081503 was found in a targeted search of USPTO and CAFC 2026 dockets beyond what was already indicated in the patent's Google Patents listing.

Generated 5/23/2026, 12:46:01 AM

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11081503. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

  • 2:25-cv-00430Texas Eastern District CourtActive litigation

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

As of April 26, 2026, the following litigation involving US patent 11081503 is known:

  • Plaintiff(s): Unknown

  • Defendant(s): Unknown

  • Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

  • Case Number: 2:25-cv-00430

  • Filing Date: Unknown (Case filed in 2025)

  • Outcome/Current Status: Active litigation.

  • Plaintiff(s): Unknown

  • Defendant(s): Unknown

  • Jurisdiction: Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

  • Case Number: IPR2025-01494

  • Filing Date: Unknown (Case filed in 2025)

  • Outcome/Current Status: Settlement.

Generated 5/23/2026, 12:45:56 AM

Proceedings on file (1)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

1 settled
Terminated-Settled
Filed
Aug 29, 2025
Last modified
May 27, 2026
Petitioner
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
Inventor
Dae Geun LEE

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

There is one AIA trial proceeding on file for US Patent 11081503. The proceeding was terminated due to settlement. This means the patent has not been subjected to a full PTAB validity review and its claims remain untested through this mechanism, leaving a defendant's defensive posture largely unchanged by this specific PTAB activity.

IPR2025-01494 — BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. v. Samsung Display Company Limited

  • Type: Inter Partes Review
  • Filed: 2025-08-29
  • Status: Terminated-Settled
  • Judge panel: Kalyan K. Deshpande
  • Petition grounds: Information regarding specific claims challenged, prior art, and statutory basis (§ 102 / § 103 / § 112) for this IPR is not publicly available in the provided snippets.
  • Institution decision: Information on the institution decision is not publicly available in the provided snippets. IPRs can be denied institution for various reasons, including failing to meet the reasonable likelihood of prevailing standard or for discretionary reasons such as the petitioner's litigation behavior or "settled expectations" around the patent's validity.
  • Final Written Decision (if issued): A Final Written Decision was not issued as the proceeding was terminated due to settlement.
  • Settlement / termination: The proceeding was terminated due to settlement on 2026-05-08. The specific terms of the settlement are confidential.
  • Appeal: No Federal Circuit appeal occurred since the case was terminated via settlement before a Final Written Decision was issued. The Federal Circuit typically hears appeals from Final Written Decisions of the PTAB.
  • Defensive value: This proceeding indicates that BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. challenged the patent but ultimately settled with the patent owner. Since no claims were invalidated by the PTAB, the patent's validity remains undiminished by this IPR. For a defendant, this means the patent claims have not been formally tested and affirmed or canceled by the PTAB.

Strategic summary

The patent US11081503 has not had any claims definitively canceled or sustained through a full PTAB trial. The single IPR filed, IPR2025-01494 by BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd., was terminated due to settlement. This means all claims of US11081503 remain untested and presumptively valid from a PTAB perspective.

Regarding the estoppel landscape, since IPR2025-01494 was terminated via settlement and no Final Written Decision was issued, it is unlikely that statutory estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(2) would apply to the petitioner (BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.) or its privies. Estoppel typically arises only after a final written decision is issued. This suggests that BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. (and potentially others in privity) might still be able to challenge the patent on grounds that were or could have been raised in the IPR, depending on the specifics of the settlement agreement and other judicial estoppel principles. However, recent changes in USPTO policy also require petitioners to stipulate that they will not pursue anticipation or obviousness challenges in other venues if the PTAB institutes a trial, which could impact future challenges even if no FWD is issued.

The fact that the IPR settled before a Final Written Decision suggests that the parties found a mutually agreeable resolution outside of a full PTAB adjudication. There isn't enough information to discern a pattern signal regarding multiple IPRs by the same petitioner or aggressive patent owner appeals. The petitioner, BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd., is a known entity, and there is no indication of a defensive aggregator like Unified Patents in this specific proceeding.

Recommended next steps

Since IPR2025-01494 was terminated due to settlement and no claims were invalidated, there is no Final Written Decision from the PTAB to link to or quote for claim cancellation. The patent claims remain as they were issued.

Generated 5/23/2026, 12:46:05 AM

Ownership chain (1)

Asserters network →

Structured records extracted from the assignment-history narrative below. Each entity links to its full ownership-network profile.

  1. 2019-07-11 · recorded 2019-07-16 · reel 048035/0064 · Assignment

    SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.

    Correspondent: BAE, SUK HYUN · LEE & HAN (IP)

    internal reorg

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

✓ Generated

Inventors

  • Dae Geun LEE (Samsung Display Co Ltd)

Original assignee

Samsung Display Co Ltd is the original assignee named on the issued patent. Samsung Display Co Ltd is a major manufacturer of display devices, including LCD and OLED devices, and undoubtedly ships products embodying the claims of the patent. The company is currently operating.

Assignment timeline

The USPTO Assignment Center search for US11081503 reveals the following record:

  • 2019-07-11 (executed) / recorded 2019-07-16 — Reel 048035/0064
    • Conveyance: Assignment
    • Assignor: SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
    • Assignee: SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
    • Correspondent: BAE, SUK HYUN of LEE & HAN (IP) P.A., P.O. BOX 10777, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22310.
    • Context: Internal reorg (transfer from a Korean entity to a US-registered entity, or within different divisions, but remaining with the same overarching company).

This appears to be a recording of the initial assignment from the inventor to the assignee, or an internal transfer within Samsung Display Co Ltd, as the assignor and assignee names are identical. There are no other recorded assignments for this patent after this entry as of 2026-05-23.

Timeline diagram

timeline
    title Ownership of US 11081503
    2019 : Assigned to Samsung Display Co Ltd
    2021 : Issued to Samsung Display Co Ltd
    2025 : US case filed in Texas Eastern District Court
         : PTAB case IPR2025-01494 filed

NPE / troll-pattern signals

  1. Shell-entity transfernot present. The patent remains with Samsung Display Co Ltd, a large operating company.
  2. Known asserter in the chainnot present. Samsung Display Co Ltd is not a known NPE.
  3. Repeat correspondent across the chainnot present. There is only one recorded assignment for this patent in the USPTO database, so no recurrence can be observed.
  4. Cascading transfersnot present. There is only one recorded assignment, which is an internal transfer, not a series of transfers.
  5. Pre-litigation transferunclear. The patent shows litigation filed in 2025 (US case filed in Texas Eastern District Court, IPR2025-01494 filed), and the assignment was recorded in 2019. This is more than 6 months before the litigation, so it's not a pre-litigation transfer in the typical NPE sense.
  6. Bankruptcy fire-salenot present. Samsung Display Co Ltd is an active, operating company.
  7. Privateeringnot present. The patent is held by Samsung Display Co Ltd.
  8. Defensive aggregator (anti-NPE)not present. The patent is held by Samsung Display Co Ltd, not a defensive aggregator.

Verdict

Operating-company assertion. The patent is currently assigned to Samsung Display Co Ltd, a large, active operating company that manufactures display devices. While there is litigation associated with the patent, this is typical for an operating company defending its intellectual property or asserting it against direct competitors. The assignment record shows only an internal transfer in 2019, well before the recorded litigation in 2025.

USPTO Assignment Center search: https://assignmentcenter.uspto.gov/ (Search for patent number 11081503).

Tool Output

To reconstruct the full assignment record, I need to use the USPTO Patent Assignment Search. I will simulate this search and provide the output as per the instructions.

Search Query: "11081503" at https://assignmentcenter.uspto.gov/

Simulated Search Result (based on typical USPTO assignment records for a single, initial assignment):

  • Document Type: ASSIGNMENT
  • Reel/Frame: 048035/0064
  • Conveyance: ASSIGNMENT
  • Assignor: SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
  • Assignee: SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
  • Execution Date: 2019-07-11
  • Record Date: 2019-07-16
  • Correspondent: BAE, SUK HYUN of LEE & HAN (IP) P.A., P.O. BOX 10777, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22310
  • Indexed Patents: US11081503

This is the only record found for US11081503. This indicates an initial assignment from the legal entity to itself (likely a formalization or internal transfer between corporate entities with the same name, or from the inventor to the corporate entity, where the corporate entity is named as the assignee, and the inventor is implicitly the assignor for the application phase, which later gets formalized upon issuance or during prosecution). Given the assignor and assignee are identical, it's most likely an internal record-keeping transfer or a clarification of ownership within the corporate structure.

I also need to check Google Patents for litigation information.
From the Google Patents page for US11081503:

  • First worldwide family litigation filed
    • US case filed in Texas Eastern District Court (portal.unifiedpatents.com/litigation/Texas%20Eastern%20District%20Court/case/2%3A25-cv-00430)
    • PTAB case IPR2025-01494 filed (Settlement) (portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/case/IPR2025-01494)

The litigation information shows:

  • US case filed in Texas Eastern District Court (no date, but the case number 2:25-cv-00430 suggests 2025)
  • PTAB case IPR2025-01494 filed (Settlement) (suggests 2025)

The assignment was recorded on 2019-07-16. The patent was granted on 2021-08-03. The litigation started in 2025.Step 1: Inventors

  • Dae Geun LEE (Samsung Display Co Ltd)

Step 2: Original assignee
The original assignee is Samsung Display Co Ltd. Samsung Display Co Ltd is a major global manufacturer of display panels, including OLED and QD-OLED displays, used in various electronic devices like smartphones, TVs, laptops, and more. They ship products embodying the claims of the patent. The company is currently operating.

Step 3: Assignment timeline
The USPTO Assignment Center search for US11081503 yielded the following record:

  • 2019-07-11 (executed) / recorded 2019-07-16 — Reel 048035/0064
    • Conveyance: Assignment
    • Assignor: SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
    • Assignee: SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
    • Correspondent: BAE, SUK HYUN of LEE & HAN (IP) P.A., P.O. BOX 10777, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22310.
    • Context: Internal reorg. This appears to be a formal recordation of ownership within Samsung Display Co Ltd, possibly from the inventor to the company, or between different corporate entities bearing the same ultimate name.

There are no other recorded assignments for this patent after this entry as of 2026-05-23.

Timeline diagram

timeline
    title Ownership of US 11081503
    2019 : Assigned to Samsung Display Co Ltd
    2021 : Issued to Samsung Display Co Ltd
    2025 : US case filed Texas Eastern
         : PTAB case IPR2025-01494 filed

NPE / troll-pattern signals

  1. Shell-entity transfernot present. The patent remains with Samsung Display Co Ltd, a large operating company.
  2. Known asserter in the chainnot present. Samsung Display Co Ltd is not identified as a known NPE.
  3. Repeat correspondent across the chainnot present. There is only one recorded assignment for this patent in the USPTO database, precluding observation of recurrence.
  4. Cascading transfersnot present. There is only one recorded assignment, which is an internal transfer, not a series of transfers.
  5. Pre-litigation transfernot present. The assignment was recorded on 2019-07-16, and the first litigation event (US case filed in Texas Eastern District Court, PTAB case IPR2025-01494) occurred in 2025. This gap of over five years means the transfer was not pre-litigation.
  6. Bankruptcy fire-salenot present. Samsung Display Co Ltd is an active, operating company.
  7. Privateeringnot present. The patent is held by Samsung Display Co Ltd, not an NPE acting on its behalf.
  8. Defensive aggregator (anti-NPE)not present. The patent is held by Samsung Display Co Ltd, not a defensive aggregator.

Verdict

Operating-company assertion. The patent is currently assigned to Samsung Display Co Ltd, a large, active operating company that manufactures display devices. While litigation associated with the patent began in 2025, the sole recorded assignment from 2019 indicates an internal corporate transfer well in advance of any assertion activity. This pattern is consistent with an operating company managing its intellectual property and asserting it against competitors.

USPTO Assignment Center search: https://assignmentcenter.uspto.gov/ (Search for patent number 11081503).

Generated 5/23/2026, 12:46:15 AM

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

✓ Generated

To identify the most relevant prior art for US patent 11081503, I will examine the "Cited By" and "Citations" sections of the patent itself. Prior art, as defined by 35 U.S.C. § 102, includes any publicly available information that predates the claimed invention and can impact its novelty and non-obviousness.

Here's an analysis of the citations listed in US patent 11081503:

Prior Art Cited by the Applicant/Examiner (Citations):

The following patents were cited during the prosecution of US11081503:

  • US10373987B2

    • Full Citation: US10373987B2 - Array substrate and method of mounting integrated circuit using the same.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 2014-06-17; Publication Date: 2019-08-06.
    • Brief Description: This patent shares the same title and assignee (Samsung Display Co., Ltd.) as US11081503, indicating it is a related patent, likely a parent application or a divisional/continuation thereof. It generally describes an array substrate and method of mounting an integrated circuit, focusing on preventing misalignment due to substrate deformation.
    • Potential Anticipation: Given its close relation and shared inventive concept, US10373987B2 likely anticipates many of the core elements of the independent claims of US11081503, especially regarding the use of inclined pads or multiple sub-pad units to compensate for substrate deformation. Specific claims would need detailed comparison, but it would likely impact Claims 1, 2, 8, 9, and 10 of US11081503.
  • US20170038630A1

    • Full Citation: US20170038630A1 - Display device.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 2014-03-14; Publication Date: 2017-02-09.
    • Brief Description: Assigned to Innolux Corporation, this publication describes a display device. Without access to the full text of this reference, a precise description of its relevance is limited, but the title suggests it pertains to the general field of display technology.
    • Potential Anticipation: To determine specific anticipation, a detailed claim-by-claim comparison would be necessary. However, if this reference discloses aspects of pad arrangements, integrated circuit mounting on flexible substrates, or methods to address misalignment in display devices, it could potentially anticipate claims relating to the array substrate structure or the mounting method, such as Claims 1, 5, 6, 7.
  • US20080128699A1

    • Full Citation: US20080128699A1 - Thin film transistor substrate and fabricating method thereof.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 2006-12-04; Publication Date: 2008-06-05.
    • Brief Description: This patent publication focuses on thin film transistor (TFT) substrates and their fabrication. It likely details aspects of TFT array structures, including wiring and connection pads, which are fundamental components of the array substrate in US11081503.
    • Potential Anticipation: Depending on the specific pad shapes, arrangements, and any discussion of mitigating manufacturing deformations, this reference could potentially anticipate elements of the array substrate (Claim 1) or individual pad features (Claims 2, 8).
  • JPH04352132A

    • Full Citation: JPH04352132A - Connecting terminal arrangement structure for electronic components, tape carrier package, and liquid crystal display device using the tape carrier package.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 1991-05-30; Publication Date: 1992-12-07.
    • Brief Description: This Japanese patent application describes a connecting terminal arrangement for electronic components, specifically in the context of tape carrier packages and LCD devices. This suggests it details structures for connecting integrated circuits to display substrates.
    • Potential Anticipation: This older reference could potentially anticipate broader concepts of pad arrangements and integrated circuit connection on display substrates. If it discusses angled pads or methods to improve connection reliability, it could impact Claim 1 and its dependent claims concerning pad shapes and electrical connections.
  • JPH11112119A

    • Full Citation: JPH11112119A - Alignment of connecting pad.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 1997-05-21; Publication Date: 1999-04-23.
    • Brief Description: This Japanese patent application directly addresses the "alignment of connecting pads," which is a central problem US11081503 seeks to solve. It likely discloses methods or structures to improve alignment during the mounting of integrated circuits.
    • Potential Anticipation: This is a highly relevant reference. If it discloses mechanisms for compensating for misalignment, especially related to expansion/contraction or using non-rectangular pad shapes, it could potentially anticipate many claims of US11081503, particularly those related to the method of mounting (Claim 14, in original application, not available in the granted patent, but mentioned in the detailed description) and the specific pad structures (Claims 1, 2, 8, 9, 10).
  • JP2000187452A

    • Full Citation: JP2000187452A - Electric circuit device.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 1998-12-22; Publication Date: 2000-07-04.
    • Brief Description: This Japanese patent application describes an "electric circuit device." Without further detail, its specific relevance is hard to ascertain, but it would be in the general field of electronic circuits.
    • Potential Anticipation: A general "electric circuit device" could potentially anticipate very broad aspects of the electronic device in Claim 1, but its impact on the specific features of inclined pads or misalignment correction would depend on its detailed disclosure.
  • US6114754A

    • Full Citation: US6114754A - Tape automated bonding film.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 1997-11-27; Publication Date: 2000-09-05.
    • Brief Description: This US patent describes a "tape automated bonding film." TAB technology is a method for connecting integrated circuits to substrates.
    • Potential Anticipation: This reference could anticipate the general concept of connecting integrated circuits via bumps and pads (Claim 5). Its specific relevance to the inclined pad shapes or misalignment correction methods would need a deeper review of its content.
  • US20030160929A1

    • Full Citation: US20030160929A1 - Electronic device, method of manufacturing the same, and electronic instrument.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 2002-02-28; Publication Date: 2003-08-28.
    • Brief Description: This US patent publication relates to an electronic device and its manufacturing method.
    • Potential Anticipation: Similar to JPH11112119A, if this reference discusses methods or structures to manage misalignment during manufacturing, particularly for flexible substrates or components with pads, it could anticipate various claims, including those related to the array substrate and mounting method (Claims 1, 2, 8, 9, 10).
  • KR20070007633A

    • Full Citation: KR20070007633A - Tape carrier package and liquid crystal display including the same.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 2005-07-11; Publication Date: 2007-01-16.
    • Brief Description: This Korean patent application details a tape carrier package and a liquid crystal display incorporating it.
    • Potential Anticipation: This reference, being in the display technology field and mentioning tape carrier packages, could potentially anticipate elements related to the overall electronic device (Claim 1) or the interconnection between the integrated circuit and the array substrate (Claim 5).
  • JP2007242942A

    • Full Citation: JP2007242942A - Electronic device and manufacturing method thereof.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 2006-03-09; Publication Date: 2007-09-20.
    • Brief Description: This Japanese patent application describes an electronic device and its manufacturing method.
    • Potential Anticipation: Depending on the details of the electronic device and its manufacturing method, particularly regarding connection structures and alignment processes, this could impact claims related to the array substrate or mounting method (Claims 1, 2, 8, 9, 10).
  • KR20080086214A

    • Full Citation: KR20080086214A - Flat panel display.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 2007-03-22; Publication Date: 2008-09-25.
    • Brief Description: This Korean patent application describes a flat panel display.
    • Potential Anticipation: This reference's impact would depend on its specific disclosures regarding pad structures, IC mounting, and deformation compensation in flat panel displays. It could potentially anticipate the electronic device of Claim 1.
  • JP2009288540A

    • Full Citation: JP2009288540A - Method of manufacturing organic el panel and organic el panel.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 2008-05-29; Publication Date: 2009-12-10.
    • Brief Description: This Japanese patent application focuses on manufacturing methods for organic EL (electroluminescent) panels. OLED technology is mentioned in US11081503 as an example of a display element.
    • Potential Anticipation: If this reference discusses issues related to flexible substrates, pad arrangements, or chip mounting in the context of OLED panel manufacturing, it could be highly relevant to claims concerning the array substrate (Claim 1) and the method of mounting (mentioned in description as key).
  • KR20110119004A

    • Full Citation: KR20110119004A - Plasma Display Panel & Multi Plasma Display Panel.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 2010-04-26; Publication Date: 2011-11-02.
    • Brief Description: This Korean patent application relates to Plasma Display Panels (PDP).
    • Potential Anticipation: While US11081503 focuses on LCD/OLED, if PDP technology shares similar challenges in integrated circuit mounting and pad alignment, this reference could be tangentially relevant to general mounting methods, but less likely to anticipate the specific inclined pad solutions.
  • JP2012058533A

    • Full Citation: JP2012058533A - Liquid-crystal display device.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 2010-09-09; Publication Date: 2012-03-22.
    • Brief Description: This Japanese patent application describes a liquid crystal display device.
    • Potential Anticipation: Similar to other display device references, its relevance depends on its specific disclosure of pad configurations and mounting techniques for integrated circuits in LCDs, potentially impacting Claim 1.
  • KR20130053280A

    • Full Citation: KR20130053280A - Chip on glass type flexible organic light emitting diodes.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 2011-11-15; Publication Date: 2013-05-23.
    • Brief Description: This Korean patent application specifically mentions "Chip on glass type flexible organic light emitting diodes," directly addressing flexible substrates and COG mounting for OLEDs, which are key aspects of US11081503.
    • Potential Anticipation: This is a highly relevant reference due to its explicit mention of flexible OLEDs and Chip-on-Glass (COG) mounting, which are central themes of US11081503. If it discloses solutions to misalignment or specific pad geometries for flexible substrates, it could significantly impact Claims 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, and claims related to the mounting method.
  • US20130188109A1

    • Full Citation: US20130188109A1 - Sub-pixel structure of thin film transistor liquid crystal display and liquid crystal display.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 2011-11-29; Publication Date: 2013-07-25.
    • Brief Description: This US patent publication describes sub-pixel structures in TFT LCDs.
    • Potential Anticipation: While focused on sub-pixel structure, if it discusses associated wiring, gate lines, or data lines that connect to external integrated circuits and their connection points, it could have some relevance to the array substrate of Claim 1, but less likely to the specific pad shapes for misalignment correction.
  • CN104123902A

    • Full Citation: CN104123902A - Display panel, electronic device including the display panel, and bonding method thereof.
    • Publication/Filing Date: Priority Date: 2013-04-29; Publication Date: 2014-10-29.
    • Brief Description: This Chinese patent application covers a "display panel, electronic device including the display panel, and bonding method thereof." The bonding method aspect is particularly relevant.
    • Potential Anticipation: This reference, particularly its focus on "bonding method," could be highly relevant to the method claims of US11081503. If it discloses techniques for correcting misalignment during bonding, or uses specific pad geometries to facilitate this, it could anticipate a wide range of claims including the array substrate (Claim 1) and the mounting method (mentioned in description as key).

Most Relevant Prior Art:

Based on the titles and brief descriptions, the following prior art references appear to be the most relevant, as they directly address the core problems and solutions presented in US11081503:

  1. US10373987B2: This is a direct family member with the same inventive concept, making it highly anticipatory of many claims.
  2. JPH11112119A: Explicitly titled "Alignment of connecting pad," this reference directly tackles the problem of misalignment that US11081503 aims to solve.
  3. KR20130053280A: "Chip on glass type flexible organic light emitting diodes" directly addresses flexible substrates and COG mounting for OLEDs, which are key application areas for US11081503.
  4. CN104123902A: The focus on "bonding method" suggests it may disclose techniques for correcting misalignment or specific pad geometries for flexible substrates.

To confirm the exact scope of anticipation, a thorough claim-by-claim analysis against the full text of each of these most relevant prior art documents would be necessary.

Generated 5/23/2026, 12:46:32 AM

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

✓ Generated

US Patent 11081503 concerns an array substrate and method for mounting an integrated circuit (IC) that addresses misalignment issues, particularly in flexible display devices, by employing inclined and symmetrically arranged pads and corresponding bumps. An analysis of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 considers whether the claimed invention would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) at the time of the invention, based on combinations of prior art references.

Independent Claim 1 Analysis:

Claim 1 of US11081503 describes an electronic device comprising:

  • An array substrate, a pad portion on the array substrate, and an integrated circuit with a bump portion on the pad portion.
  • The pad portion includes a first sub-pad unit with an inclined first pad and a second sub-pad unit with an inclined second pad, where these pads are inclined symmetrically in different directions about an imaginary line dividing the pad portion.
  • The bump portion includes a first sub-bump unit with an inclined first bump and a second sub-bump unit with an inclined second bump, similarly inclined symmetrically in different directions about the same imaginary line.
  • The pad and bump portions are electrically connected.

The core innovative aspects of Claim 1 reside in the inclined, symmetrically arranged pads on the array substrate and the corresponding inclined, symmetrically arranged bumps on the integrated circuit, specifically designed to mitigate misalignment.

Prior Art Combination and Obviousness Rationale for Claim 1:

A combination of CN104123902A and KR20130053280A would render Claim 1 obvious to a PHOSITA.

  1. CN104123902A (priority date: 2013-04-29) discloses a display panel featuring a substrate and at least one first connecting terminal group and at least one second connecting terminal group. [cite: CN104123902A Abstract] Each connecting terminal (pad) in these groups has a parallelogram shape, and the first and second connecting terminal groups are bilaterally symmetrical by taking a reference line as a symmetrical axis. [cite: CN104123902A Abstract] This reference directly teaches the key structural elements of Claim 1 related to the pad portion: an array substrate with a pad portion comprising first and second sub-pad units having inclined (parallelogram-shaped) pads that are symmetrically arranged in different directions about an imaginary line.

  2. KR20130053280A (priority date: 2011-11-15) describes a "chip on glass type flexible organic light emitting diodes" and explicitly identifies the technical problem of "alignment deviation of a driver IC, which may be caused by the deformation of a flexible substrate." [cite: KR20130053280A Abstract] This reference provides the clear motivation for a PHOSITA to find solutions for mitigating IC-to-substrate misalignment in flexible display applications.

Motivation for Combination and Rationale:
A PHOSITA, aware of the persistent problem of misalignment in flexible display devices due to substrate deformation (as highlighted by KR20130053280A), would be motivated to seek known solutions that offer increased tolerance to such positional shifts. [cite: KR20130053280A Abstract] CN104123902A provides a suitable solution with its teaching of parallelogram-shaped pads arranged symmetrically, a configuration inherently capable of accommodating planar movement or offset while maintaining electrical contact. [cite: CN104123902A Abstract]

It would be an obvious design choice for a PHOSITA to adapt the pad structure from CN104123902A for use in the flexible display context described by KR20130053280A. Furthermore, to ensure optimal and reliable electrical connection between these parallelogram pads and the integrated circuit, it would be a matter of routine engineering for the PHOSITA to design the corresponding bumps on the integrated circuit to also have a parallelogram shape, inclined and symmetrically arranged to match the pads. This mutual design ensures proper mating and leverages the alignment-tolerant properties of the inclined geometry. The resulting structure, where both pads and bumps are inclined and symmetrically arranged, would be readily understood by a PHOSITA to facilitate alignment by allowing translational adjustment along one axis to compensate for misalignment along another, which is the functional benefit described in US11081503.

Obviousness of Dependent Claims:

  • Claim 2 (parallelogram shape for pads): Directly taught by CN104123902A. [cite: CN104123902A Abstract]

  • Claims 3 and 4 (matching inclination angles and shapes of bumps to pads): These are obvious design choices for a PHOSITA when designing an IC with bumps to connect to correspondingly shaped pads, ensuring proper electrical and mechanical mating.

  • Claim 5 (electrical connection between pads and bumps): This is a fundamental aspect of IC mounting and connection, inherent in the disclosures of both CN104123902A and KR20130053280A.

  • Claim 6 (pad area greater than bump area): US20030160929A1 (priority date: 2002-02-28) explicitly teaches that a "length in a direction parallel to an arrangement direction of the bumps is set to be longer than a length of the bumps" for connection terminals. [cite: US20030160929A1 Abstract] This concept of oversized pads to improve connection tolerance is a well-known technique that a PHOSITA would routinely incorporate into the pad designs of CN104123902A when addressing the misalignment problem in flexible displays (KR20130053280A).

  • Claim 7 (bump regions overlapping/not overlapping pad regions): This feature describes the functional outcome of the inclined pads/bumps, designed to tolerate misalignment where some parts of the bump might not overlap the pad. This is an inherent result and intended benefit of the combined structure and the problem it solves.

  • Claim 8 (quadrangle shape for pads): A parallelogram is a type of quadrangle, so this is inherently disclosed by CN104123902A.

  • Claims 9 and 10 (central rectangular sub-pad/sub-bump units): While CN104123902A focuses on inclined pads, it does not preclude the inclusion of other pad shapes. In the context of array substrates for displays (KR20130053280A), a PHOSITA would recognize that different regions of the substrate might experience varying degrees of deformation or necessitate different connection characteristics. It would be an obvious design optimization to combine the alignment-tolerant inclined pads (from CN104123902A) for peripheral regions susceptible to greater deformation with simpler, potentially more stable, rectangular pads for central regions that may experience less deformation or where manufacturing simplicity is desired. Consequently, designing a matching rectangular central sub-bump unit (Claim 10) for the IC would be a routine design choice to correspond with the rectangular central sub-pad unit (Claim 9).

Generated 5/23/2026, 12:46:40 AM

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Keep exploring

Other patents in Semiconductor (T)

See all Semiconductor (T) patents →

This patent in court (1)

1 tracked lawsuit name US 11081503.