Patent 10115439
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Proceedings overview
There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 10,115,439. This gives a defendant a neutral defensive posture, as the patent has not been subjected to PTAB scrutiny.
Strategic summary
As there are no PTAB proceedings on file for US Patent 10,115,439, all claims (1-20) remain untested by AIA trial proceedings. This means there are no canceled or sustained claims from IPRs, PGRs, or CBMs.
The estoppel landscape is clear: since no proceedings have been filed, there are no prior art grounds barred by § 315(e)(2) for any potential petitioner. All prior art grounds remain available for a future challenge.
There are no patterns to observe regarding petitioners or patent owner's PTAB appeal aggressiveness, as no proceedings have taken place.
Recommended next steps
If you are a defendant currently facing assertion of US Patent 10,115,439, the absence of PTAB activity suggests that a post-grant challenge (e.g., an Inter Partes Review) could be a viable option to test the patent's validity. The lack of prior challenges means that the patent's claims have not been subjected to the rigorous scrutiny of an AIA trial, and thus no claims have been hardened against such challenges.
Generated 5/25/2026, 6:45:29 PM