The docket

Patent litigations.

6,606 cases tracked. Click any row for full case detail; use the buckets below to slice by patent, plaintiff, or defendant. Manage cases (upload CSV, edit, delete) in Admin.

Demand letter analyzer

You got a patent demand letter. Now what?

Paste the letter — we extract the asserted patents, identify the asserter, characterize their litigation history, flag validity vulnerabilities, and draft a sample response letter your attorney can review. Free, private, ~2-3 minutes.

Analyze a letter →

Patent litigation filed per year

1986: 2 cases'861988: 1 case1990: 1 case'901992: 1 case1993: 1 case'941996: 3 cases1997: 2 cases1998: 3 cases'981999: 3 cases2000: 3 cases2001: 5 cases'022003: 10 cases2004: 4 cases2005: 13 cases2006: 15 cases'062007: 17 cases2008: 20 cases2009: 12 cases2010: 39 cases'102011: 36 cases2012: 68 cases2013: 110 cases2014: 95 cases'142015: 107 cases2016: 103 cases2017: 163 cases2018: 171 cases'182019: 198 cases2020: 226 cases2021: 254 cases2022: 358 cases'222023: 321 cases2024: 548 cases2025: 758 cases7582026: 333 cases'26
6,606 tracked cases by filing year.

Analyze a patent

Drop a US patent number — we’ll verify it on Google Patents and generate the full invalidity dossier.

By industry

All litigations

CasePatentsCourtFiledStatus
Proxense, LLC v. Target Corporation6:20-cv-00879W.D. Tex.——
Untitled case2:14-cv-00722Eastern District of Texas——
Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Mercedes-Benz U.S. International, Inc.2:14-cv-00535E.D. Tex.—Closed
Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.2:14-cv-00222E.D. Tex.—Closed
Greenthread, LLC v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.1:23-cv-00579D. Del., Judge Richard G. Andrews—stayed/administratively closed pending PTAB IPRs
Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Sling TV, L.L.C.U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—affirmed
Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Hulu et al.MDL No. 2845Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation—denied centralization
In re: Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC Patent LitigationMDL No. 2845Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation—transfer denied
Netflix, Inc. v. Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLCIPR2018-01817Patent Trial and Appeal Board—final written decision; claims unpatentable
Untitled case6:19-cv-00441W.D. Tex.——
Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Adobe Systems Inc.1:18-cv-10355D. Mass.——
Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Polycom, Inc.1:17-cv-02692D. Colo.——
Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.6:17-cv-00591E.D. Tex.——
In re Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC Patent Litig.MDL No. 2845Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation—denied centralization
Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.6:17-cv-00591Eastern District of Texas—resolved
Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Apple Inc.1:17-cv-02869District of Colorado—resolved
Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Brightcove Inc.1:17-cv-01519District of Delaware—dismissed/closed
Hulu, LLC et al. v. Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLCIPR2018-01227Patent Trial and Appeal Board, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office—certificate issued
Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Hulu, LLC2:17-cv-07611U.S. District Court for the Central District of California——
Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Adobe Systems Inc.1:18-cv-10355; 2:18-cv-09344-GW-JCU.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts; transferred to U.S. District Court for the Central District of California—transferred