The docket

Patent litigations.

6,606 cases tracked. Click any row for full case detail; use the buckets below to slice by patent, plaintiff, or defendant. Manage cases (upload CSV, edit, delete) in Admin.

Demand letter analyzer

You got a patent demand letter. Now what?

Paste the letter — we extract the asserted patents, identify the asserter, characterize their litigation history, flag validity vulnerabilities, and draft a sample response letter your attorney can review. Free, private, ~2-3 minutes.

Analyze a letter →

Patent litigation filed per year

1986: 2 cases'861988: 1 case1990: 1 case'901992: 1 case1993: 1 case'941996: 3 cases1997: 2 cases1998: 3 cases'981999: 3 cases2000: 3 cases2001: 5 cases'022003: 10 cases2004: 4 cases2005: 13 cases2006: 15 cases'062007: 17 cases2008: 20 cases2009: 12 cases2010: 39 cases'102011: 36 cases2012: 68 cases2013: 110 cases2014: 95 cases'142015: 107 cases2016: 103 cases2017: 163 cases2018: 171 cases'182019: 198 cases2020: 226 cases2021: 254 cases2022: 358 cases'222023: 321 cases2024: 548 cases2025: 758 cases7582026: 333 cases'26
6,606 tracked cases by filing year.

Analyze a patent

Drop a US patent number — we’ll verify it on Google Patents and generate the full invalidity dossier.

By industry

All litigations

CasePatentsCourtFiledStatus
Uber Technologies, Inc. v. X One, Inc.19-1164U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—reversed PTAB decision
Unified Patents PTAB Data v. Data Health Partners IncIPR2024-00618Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the USPTO—Not Instituted - Merits
Untitled case1:26-cv-02292Illinois Northern District Court—litigation
Untitled case2:26-cv-00013Texas Eastern District Court—active
Untitled case1:26-cv-00989Texas Western District Court——
Happy Products, Inc. v. Ontel Products Corporation2:24-cv-09819United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (DNJ)—active
Untitled case337-TA-1422International Trade Commission—Critical
Unified Patents v. Trina Solar Co. Ltd.IPR2025-00187PTAB—judgment
Untitled casePGR2025-00041PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board)—Instituted
Unified Patents v. Atossa Therapeutics Inc et al.PGR2025-00043Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)—Settlement
Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Atossa Therapeutics, Inc. et al.IPR2025-00799U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)—Settled
Untitled case8:25-cv-00657California Central District Court——
Stingray Group Inc. v. Edwin A. Hernandez-MondragonIPR2025-00351Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)—Instituted
Untitled caseIPR2025-00350Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)—Pending - Instituted
Untitled case2:24-cv-00433Texas Eastern District Court—ongoing
Untitled case2:24-cv-00645Texas Eastern District Court—Case filed
Petitioner v. Patent OwnerIPR2025-00311Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)—Pending - Instituted
Untitled casePGR2025-00006Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)—Instituted
Stratasys, Inc. v. Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co. Ltd. et al.2:24-cv-00644-JRGU.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division—Consolidated
Unified Patents v. Cleveland Medical Devices Inc.IPR2025-00159Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)—Pending - Instituted