Litigation
Consolidated Roller-Mill Co. v. Coombs
judgmentAuto-generating section 1 of 4: Case overview & background…
Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.
- Terminated
- 1889-05-20
Patents at issue (4)
Plaintiffs (1)
Defendants (1)
Summary
In equity. Asserted patents were Gray 222,895, Dowling 289,518, and Marmon 274,508. US 265,927 was not asserted; the court relied on it as anticipatory prior art against Marmon 274,508. Decree for plaintiff on the Gray patent; bill dismissed as to the Dowling and Marmon patents.
Case overview & background
Plain-language overview of the case: parties, accused product, patents at issue, and why the suit matters.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Key legal developments & outcome
Major rulings, motions, claim construction, settlements, and the present posture or final disposition.
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Plaintiff representatives
Counsel of record for the plaintiff(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).
Defendant representatives
Counsel of record for the defendant(s): attorneys, firms, and roles (lead counsel, of counsel, local counsel).
Not yet generated. Click Generate to run the LLM with web-search grounding (~30-60s).