Plaintiff
11 cases as plaintiff.
Company overview. ReadyComm LLC is a New Mexico limited liability company with a stated principal place of business at 1209 Mountain Rd Pl NE, Suite N, Albuquerque, NM 87110 (the address recited in its complaints). Its Rule 7.1 disclosures in the Delaware cases state "no parents or affiliates listed." Public sources do not identify a founding year, employee count, revenue, or any operating parent; no website or product presence could be verified.
Products / services. ReadyComm appears to have no operations. It is characterized in the Stanford NPE Litigation Database (asserter category: "Acquired patents") and by PatSnap as a patent assertion entity. Across every tracked case it asserts a single patent, U.S. 9,179,011, "Telephone Communication System and Method of Using" (issued 2015-11-03; priority 2008-06-24; inventor Paul Newman; a continuation-in-part of an application that issued as U.S. 9,049,275). The claims cover a group of interdependent telephones in which one device is "active" and the rest "stand-by," with switching possible on the fly during a call — technology aimed at call routing across multiple devices and phone numbers.
Litigation posture. ReadyComm is a pure plaintiff-side litigant: 11 tracked cases as plaintiff and zero as defendant. That profile is the classic signature of a non-practicing entity asserting an acquired portfolio rather than an operating company defending itself. Filing venues cluster in plaintiff-friendly or convenient forums — E.D. Tex. (Judge Rodney Gilstrap), N.D. Tex. Dallas Division, D. Del. (Judge Maryellen Noreika), and D. Colo. Counsel of record includes Rabicoff Law LLC (Chicago) and, in some Delaware matters, Silverman, McDonald & Friedman.
Notable cases. The March 2025 filings against Avaya, AT&T, Mitel Networks, and NEC were followed by suits against Zoom, Ooma, Intermedia.net, Dialpad, and Nextiva, and by 2026 complaints against Talkdesk and Crexendo. Defendants are predominantly VoIP, UCaaS, and unified-communications vendors. RPX described the activity as a "Call Handling Campaign" expanding in Delaware. Several cases closed quickly before an answer: the Mitel action was voluntarily dismissed, while Ooma and Zoom were dismissed with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), leaving the '011 patent intact and available for assertion against other parties.
Watchlist
Email-only, free, anonymous. We'll notify you when ReadyComm LLC files another patent-infringement lawsuit. One-click unsubscribe from any alert.
ReadyComm LLC sued Crexendo, Inc. in D. Del. Crexendo disclosed the complaint in a quarterly report filed in 2026, referencing the March 5, 2026 filing.
ReadyComm LLC sued Talkdesk, Inc. in D. Del. The case was terminated on 2026-02-20 and had flags CLOSED and PATENT.
ReadyComm LLC sued Dialpad, Inc. in D. Del. The status was not confirmed in the sources reviewed.
ReadyComm LLC sued Nextiva, Inc. in D. Del. Docket activity through Feb. 2026 included a stipulation to extend time dated 2026-02-06; one aggregator labels it closed, which conflicts with docket entries, so the case is treated as unresolved.
ReadyComm LLC sued Intermedia.net, Inc. in D. Del. Defendant answered and counterclaimed on 2025-11-14, and the case was terminated by a Stipulation of Dismissal and '[SO ORDERED]' entry in late Nov. 2025.
ReadyComm LLC sued Avaya LLC in N.D. Tex., Dallas Division. The complaint with jury demand was filed, and venue was based on Avaya's Irving, TX place of business; no dispositive outcome was identified in the sources reviewed.
ReadyComm LLC sued AT&T, Inc. in E.D. Tex. The plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal on 2025-04-04, and an Order Dismissing Case was entered on 2025-04-08.
ReadyComm LLC sued Mitel Networks Corporation in E.D. Tex. A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was filed 2025-03-29, and an Order Dismissing Case was entered 2025-03-31.
ReadyComm LLC sued NEC Corporation in E.D. Tex. The case was dismissed without prejudice under FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i); the court accepted/acknowledged the notice, each party bears its own costs, and there was no merits ruling or fee-shifting.
ReadyComm LLC sued Zoom Communications Video, Inc. in D. Colo. The case was dismissed with prejudice via plaintiff's Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) dismissal notice; each party bears its own costs, and defendant was represented by Mayer Brown.
ReadyComm LLC sued Ooma, Inc. in D. Del. The case was dismissed with prejudice via Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) notice; each party bears its own costs, and it resolved approximately 17 days after filing, pre-answer.