Plaintiff
23 cases as plaintiff.
Company overview. Lab Technology LLC is a New Mexico limited liability company with its principal place of business at 1209 Mountain Rd Pl NE, Albuquerque, NM, according to its own complaints (e.g., Lab Technology LLC v. Lumen Technologies). It is a private, standalone entity: its Rule 7.1 disclosures list no parents or affiliates, and no public founding date, revenue, or headcount figures are available from any source found.
Operations. Lab Technology has no identifiable products, services, or operations. Business databases classify it generically (D&B lists a "testing laboratories" code), while patent-litigation trackers (Ex Parte; PatSnap) characterize it as a non-practicing patent assertion entity. It asserts an acquired telecommunications patent portfolio — in complaints it describes itself as "assignee of all right, title and interest" in the patents. Core assets include U.S. Patent No. 8,483,102 (mapping a voice identity across multiple telephony networks with time attributes, filed 2007), No. 8,503,973 (obtaining emergency caller location / E911, filed 2011), and No. 9,219,982 (location-server technology).
Litigation posture. A pure plaintiff: all 6 tracked cases are infringement suits filed by Lab Technology; it has never appeared as a defendant. Cases cluster against large operating telecom and unified-communications companies — AT&T, Lumen Technologies, Zoom (Zoom Communications Video), 3CX USA, and Alaio — in venues frequently chosen by NPEs, including the Eastern District of Texas (Marshall) and Western District of Texas (Midland/Odessa), plus Colorado, E.D. Va., S.D. Fla., and W.D. Wis. It is represented by Isaac Rabicoff of Rabicoff Law LLC. Several suits ended quickly in voluntary dismissal without prejudice (AT&T, filed June 2024, dismissed within a month; Lumen, dismissed June 2025).
Context. Beyond the six tracked cases, litigation databases document a broader campaign by Lab Technology asserting the same E911/telephony-location patents against targets including Cisco, u-blox, Everbridge, Keysight, and Greenlight Financial, with many cases dismissed early. Its asserted technology centers on VoIP-era emergency-caller location, voice identity, and location-based services. No litigation-funding source or original portfolio owner is publicly documented.
Watchlist
Email-only, free, anonymous. We'll notify you when Lab Technology LLC files another patent-infringement lawsuit. One-click unsubscribe from any alert.
Lab Technology LLC asserted US 9,219,982 against Solera Holdings, LLC in N.D. Tex. The case was pending as of the record; counsel included Rabicoff Law LLC and Crewse Law Firm.
Lab Technology LLC sued Everbridge, Inc. in D. Del. The asserted patents were 8,503,973 and 9,219,982. The case was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) about 27 days after filing, before defendant answered; no merits ruling.
Lab Technology LLC asserted US 9,219,982 against Greenlight Financial Technology, Inc. in D. Del. The case was dismissed with prejudice on July 23, 2026, with claims held ineligible under 35 U.S.C. §101 (Alice step 1 and step 2); leave to amend denied.
Action against Bitrix, Inc. and Alaio, Inc. in the Eastern District of Virginia. An amended complaint was filed August 27, 2025 against Alaio, Inc., and the case remained pending as of the last docket data.
Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed 3CX USA Corp. under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i); the case was dismissed with prejudice on August 20, 2025, with no fee-shifting, damages, or merits ruling.
Complaint filed by Lab Technology LLC against Lumen Technologies, Inc., asserting U.S. Patent 8,483,102 and U.S. Patent 8,503,973 and alleging direct and induced infringement.
Lab Technology LLC filed suit against Google LLC in W.D. Tex. asserting US 8,498,388. The case was voluntarily dismissed on 2024-06-28 under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) before an answer was filed.
Lab Technology LLC filed suit against LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. in W.D. Tex. asserting US 8,498,388. The case was voluntarily dismissed on 2024-06-28 before answer, with no merits ruling.
Suit against Zoom Communications Video, Inc. in the District of Colorado was voluntarily dismissed about 13 days after filing.
Lab Technology LLC sued AT&T, Inc. in the Eastern District of Texas over U.S. Patent 8,483,102. The case was voluntarily dismissed and terminated on July 3, 2024.
Lab Technology LLC filed suit against Amazon.com, Inc. in E.D. Tex. asserting US 8,498,388. The case was active as of the narrative, with PTAB/parallel proceedings referenced.
Lab Technology LLC filed suit against Bose Corporation in E.D. Tex. asserting US 8,498,388 as part of a five-patent assertion campaign. The narrative lists it as on record but does not state a resolution.
Lab Technology LLC sued Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (originally named Verizon Communications Inc.) in E.D. Tex. Patents-in-suit included 8,503,973. Verizon Communications Inc. was dismissed without prejudice and substituted; the case was later dismissed by joint motion on Dec. 4, 2024, with no merits ruling.
Case listed in Unified Patents litigation data associated with U.S. Patent 8,483,102 in the Western District of Wisconsin. The defendant's identity and current status could not be confirmed from the searches described.
Lab Technology LLC sued Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in E.D. Tex. Five patents were asserted, including 8,503,973. The court dismissed the case without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) after plaintiff's notice of dismissal; no merits ruling.
Lab Technology LLC sued Cisco Systems, Inc. in W.D. Tex. A notice of voluntary dismissal was filed; the prejudice term was not specified on the public docket. The case was among suits asserting 8,503,973, with no merits ruling.
Lab Technology LLC sued MetTel, Inc. in D. Del. A complaint was filed, a Rule 7.1 disclosure was made, and summons issued. The Patent/Trademark Report lists 8,503,973; the case is early stage.
Lab Technology LLC filed a patent infringement complaint under §271 against TELUS International (U.S.) Corp. in D. Nev.; counsel included Rabicoff/Law and Glenn Truitt. The asserted patent(s) were not confirmed to include 8,503,973 in the narrative's results. Early stage.
Lab Technology LLC filed a §271 patent infringement complaint against Solera Holdings, LLC in N.D. Tex. Whether 8,503,973 is asserted was not confirmed. Early stage.
Lab Technology LLC asserted US 9,219,982 against Verizon Communications Inc. in E.D. Tex. The accused product is the Verizon Care Smart app.
Lab Technology LLC asserted US 9,219,982 against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in E.D. Tex. The case was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Samsung never appeared. The accused product was the Galaxy Watch6.
Lab Technology LLC filed suit against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in E.D. Tex. asserting US 8,498,388. The case was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and Samsung never appeared.
A 2024 E.D. Tex. case listed on the '388 patent's litigation record with Lab Technology LLC as plaintiff. The named defendant was not confirmed in the narrative; defendant motion practice was reported in 2026.