59 known cases. View patent page →
'790 attached as Exhibit 2 with claim chart (Ex. 5); docket showed 'Open' as of 2020-02-17. Later outcome not confirmed.
Voluntary dismissal by plaintiff 2020-06-16; terminated ~2020-06-17.
Voluntary dismissal; case terminated 2021-06-22.
Voluntary dismissal 2022-01-12; case terminated.
Voluntary dismissal; terminated 2022-02-15.
Reported 'Pending – Other Pending' as of Dec. 2022.
Listed in Stanford NPE database.
Listed in Lexology's Feb. 2023 retail patent litigation report; patents identified as 6,972,790 and 8,537,242.
Voluntary dismissal WITH PREJUDICE 2024-04-17 under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i); each side bears own costs. No damages, no injunction, no claim construction.
Complaint asserts '790 + '242; status not confirmed.
Asserted '790 + '242 (and '527 per complaint analysis).
Asserted '790 + '242.
Listed in Stanford NPE database.
Complaint filed; summons issued; Rabicoff Law appearing for plaintiff.
Complaint filed; summons issued.
Patent case (35 U.S.C.); whether '790 is asserted not confirmed in the retrieved record.
Korean-defendant case from KIPO-published table; defendant anonymized as 'C', SME.
Korean-defendant case from KIPO-published table; defendant anonymized as 'B', large corp.
Cedar Lane '790-family case; stayed pending dismissal/settlement.
Judge Vince Chhabria granted a motion to strike third amended complaint, dismissed induced/contributory infringement claims, and ordered Cedar Lane and attorney Isaac Rabicoff to show cause. Parties stipulated to dismissal with prejudice (October 2020).
Cedar Lane '790-family case; stayed pending dismissal.
Listed among Cedar Lane '790-family cases in pleadings stage as of Oct. 2020.
Listed among Cedar Lane '790-family cases in pleadings stage as of Oct. 2020.
Listed among Cedar Lane '790-family cases in pleadings stage as of Oct. 2020.
'790 asserted, Exhibit 8 claim chart.
Cedar Lane '790-family case; the '790/'242 image-processing pair accused against camera products (e.g., Wyze Labs).
Listed among Cedar Lane '790-family cases.
Listed among Cedar Lane '790-family cases.
Listed among Cedar Lane '790-family cases.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Named in Stanford NPE Litigation Database entry for US 6,972,790.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued TCL Communication, Inc. in D. Del.; the PTO patent report lists US 6,473,527, US 6,516,147, US 6,566,805, US 6,972,774, and US 6,972,790.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Synectics PLC in W.D. Tex.; IPWatchdog attributes US 6,972,790, US 6,473,527, and US 8,537,242 to this case.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued KTC America in D.N.J.; IPWatchdog attributes US 6,473,527 along with US 6,972,790 and US 8,537,242.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Adesso Incorporated in D. Del.; Cedar Lane's claims on US 6,473,527, US 6,972,790, and US 8,537,242 were dismissed with prejudice, while Adesso's counterclaims were dismissed without prejudice.
KIPO NPE report ties this D.N.J. Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. suit to US 6,473,527 and reports settlement on 2023-03-22; IPWatchdog separately lists this docket as Hanwha Techwin America and as asserting only US 6,972,790.
Cedar Lane sued GoPro in D. Del. on the '242 and related patents. Terminated 2021-10-12 on plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal.
Cedar Lane sued Fantasia Trading in D. Del. on the '242 and related patents. Voluntary dismissal granted 2022-01-25.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242, '790, and '867 against Reolink Digital Technology. The case reportedly settled 2021-08-09 for US$10,000 plus a perpetual worldwide license and covenant not to sue; suit withdrawn.
Cedar Lane asserted the '242 and '790 against The L.S. Starrett Company in D. Del.
Cedar Lane sued Reolink Digital in W.D. Tex., Waco Division, asserting US 8,165,867 along with US 6,972,790 and US 8,537,242. The parties settled for US$10,000 on 2021-08-09 with a worldwide perpetual license; Cedar Lane withdrew the suit and moved to dismiss.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Royole Corporation in D. Del. asserting US 6,566,805 along with US 6,972,790 and US 8,537,242 according to the AO-120 report. An answer deadline was set for 2020-09-21, and the case was later terminated.
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. sued Azpen Innovation in E.D. Tex., asserting U.S. Patents 6,972,790; 8,537,242; 6,972,774; and 10,346,105. The case was voluntarily dismissed and terminated on April 13, 2021.