Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC v. Accelo, Inc.
filed- Docket:
- 1:23-cv-00001
- Court:
- D. Del. (Judge Noreika)
Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC sued Accelo, Inc. in D. Del. in the 2023 assertion campaign. Resolution not confirmed in sources retrieved.
13 known cases. View patent page →
Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC sued Accelo, Inc. in D. Del. in the 2023 assertion campaign. Resolution not confirmed in sources retrieved.
Dismissed with prejudice by stipulated Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) dismissal; each side bears own costs. No merits ruling.
Dismissed with prejudice by joint stipulation under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) on Feb 5, 2024; each side bears own costs.
Filed in the 2023 campaign; outcome not confirmed.
Stipulation of dismissal entered Dec 12, 2023. First Amended Complaint (Aug 10, 2023) added Pennar Software Corp. as plaintiff.
Motion to dismiss filed; Amended Complaint Nov 6, 2023; outcome not confirmed.
Court granted Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal on 35 U.S.C. § 101, holding asserted claims of both the '644 and '448 patents ineligible; dismissed with prejudice.
Filed asserting the '448 and '644 patents; status pending/other per docket summary.
Voluntarily dismissed with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1) before any answer; plaintiffs relinquished future suits on these patents against ProofHub.
Complaint asserts both the '448 and '644 patents against an online project-management app associated with workzone.com; status not confirmed.
Settled in principle; action dismissed/discontinued without prejudice to reopening within 30 days (order Aug 2, 2023).
Voluntary dismissal with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) filed Apr 23, 2024, before answer.
Additional docket number identified on the Google Patents litigation record for US 8,117,644; defendants not confirmed in the narrative. Part of the 2023 assertion campaign described as asserting the '644 and '448 patents.