TaskWorld Inc.

I'll research this company before writing.

Let me check the litigation context and the company's current status.

Company overview. Taskworld Inc. is the legal entity behind "Taskworld," a cloud-based project- and task-management software vendor. The product began around 2006 as an internal task-tracking tool at Synergia One Group, the portfolio holding company of founder Fred Mouawad, and was spun out as Taskworld Inc. in 2012–2013 (the company's own history places incorporation in 2013). Public sources conflict on headquarters: Taskworld / Craft list Singapore (18 Boon Lay Way, Tradehub 21) and Montclair, NJ, while earlier press describes a New York launch with operations in Bangkok and offices added in Tokyo, Berlin, Paris and Seoul by 2018. The Singapore patent applicant for its own filings is Taskworld Holdings Pte. Ltd.; Tracxn also lists a Thai entity, Taskworld Company Limited. It is private and, per Tracxn, has raised no disclosed venture rounds. Size data is thin and third-party only: Tracxn reported about 65 employees (2026), and Salary.com estimates 50–100 employees and $10M–$50M revenue — treat both as unverified estimates.

Products / operations. Taskworld is an operating SaaS company, not an NPE. Its platform combines Kanban-style boards, task assignment, project chat channels, file sharing, timelines and reporting/analytics, plus performance metrics. It ships web, iOS and Android apps and offers shared-cloud, dedicated-cloud and on-premise deployment. Since 2022 the company has emphasized verticals, starting with hospitality, and more recently deskless/F&B workforces.

Patent-litigation posture. The case data shows one tracked matter, all as defendant: this is an operating company defending against an outside asserter, not a two-way litigant. The suit is Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC v. TaskWorld Inc., No. 1:23-cv-00042-MN (D. Del., filed January 2023), asserting U.S. Patent Nos. 6,845,448 and 8,117,644 — patents originally held by Pennar Software Corporation — covering permissioned access to stored personal information and online document collaboration. Stanford's NPE Litigation Database classifies Web 2.0 Technologies as a non-practicing entity asserting acquired patents, and Seyfarth Shaw's "NPE Showcase" describes it as a nuisance-suit NPE. Venue was D. Del., not the Eastern District of Texas.

Context. Web 2.0 filed a 2023 wave of near-identical complaints against collaboration and project-management vendors, including Trello, Zendesk, Freshworks, Miro, LiquidPlanner, Basecamp, Nulab and ProofHub. Taskworld separately holds a small patent position of its own (a "digital pinboard system" filing by Taskworld Holdings Pte. Ltd., inventor Fred Mouawad, with a US patent issued in December 2021), but it has never appeared as a patent plaintiff. Final disposition of the Delaware case beyond 2023 docket activity was not verified.