Untitled case

This patent infringement litigation, Velos Media, LLC v. The Walt Disney Company et al., case number 2:26-cv-03052, was filed on March 20, 2026, in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The plaintiff, Velos Media, LLC, is identified as a Patent Assertion Entity (NPE) and a Delaware entity. The defendants are The Walt Disney Company, along with several of its subsidiaries: Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution LLC, Disney DTC LLC, Disney Streaming Services LLC, Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC, Disney Platform Distribution, Inc., BAMTech, LLC, Hulu, LLC, and ESPN, Inc., all also Delaware entities. The case has been assigned to Judge Serena R. Murillo, with Magistrate Judge Michael B. Kaufman referred for proceedings. The Central District of California is a prominent venue for intellectual property litigation, known for its experienced judiciary and willingness to adjudicate dispositive motions, though it generally does not have specific patent local rules.

The core of the dispute centers on the alleged infringement of video compression and decoding technologies compliant with the H.265/High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) standard. Velos Media asserts six patents, including US Patent 12088843, against Disney's streaming services, specifically Disney+, Hulu, Hulu Live, and ESPN+. The '843 patent, titled "Method for deriving a motion vector," is directed to efficiently determining a list of candidate motion vectors for inter-picture prediction in video coding. The accused functionality involves Disney's H.265-compliant decoders, which allegedly utilize co-located blocks from prior frames to assist in predicting motion vectors in the current frame.

This case is notable due to Velos Media's identity as an NPE asserting patents crucial to the widely adopted H.265 video compression standard, a foundational technology for high-quality digital video streaming. It forms part of a broader enforcement campaign, as Velos Media previously asserted the same six patents against ByteDance (TikTok) in the Western District of Texas. The complaint details a history of unsuccessful licensing negotiations, with Velos Media alleging that it made good-faith offers to license its patent portfolio to Disney on reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) terms, including through the Avanci Video patent pool, which Disney did not accept. Furthermore, the case against ByteDance involved an "anti-interference injunction" from Judge Albright to prevent interference via a separate action filed in China, highlighting the complex, multi-jurisdictional nature of Velos Media's licensing and litigation strategy for its standard-essential patents.

Velos Media, LLC initiated a patent infringement lawsuit against The Walt Disney Company and its various streaming subsidiaries in the California Central District Court on March 20, 2026. The case, 2:26-cv-03052, alleges infringement of multiple patents related to H.265/HEVC video compression and decoding technologies by Disney+, Hulu, Hulu Live, and ESPN+ streaming services.

Here's a chronological summary of the key legal developments to date:

1. Filing & Initial Pleadings

• Complaint Filed (2026-03-20): Velos Media, LLC (identified as Velos Media International Ltd. in some records, but primarily Velos Media, LLC) filed the complaint against The Walt Disney Company, Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC, Hulu, LLC, BAMTech, LLC, Disney Platform Distribution Inc., Disney Streaming Services LLC, Disney DTC LLC, ESPN, Inc., and Disney Media & Entertainment Distribution LLC. The complaint asserts infringement of six patents essential to the H.265 Standard video decoding. While the initial prompt mentioned US patent 12088843, current available information for this specific case prominently details US Patent No. 8,964,849 ("Multi-level significance maps for encoding and decoding") as one of the asserted patents. The plaintiff, represented by McKool Smith, P.C., alleges a history of unsuccessful licensing negotiations, claiming Disney was aware of the patents since at least December 2025 and refused to license the technology on reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) terms.
• Corporate Disclosure Statement and Notice of Interested Parties (Date not specified, but filed by defendants): The defendants, including BAMTech, LLC, Disney DTC LLC, Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC, Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution LLC, Disney Platform Distribution, Inc., Disney Streaming Services LLC, ESPN, LLC, Hulu, LLC, and The Walt Disney Company, filed this statement.

2. Pre-trial Motions of Substance

• Motion to Dismiss (2026-05-25): The defendants filed a "motion to dismiss (cause or other)." The specific grounds and outcome of this motion are not yet publicly detailed beyond its filing.
• Current Status: As of July 22, 2026, the case is listed as "Open" or "Active" in various legal databases, presided over by Judge Serena R. Murillo.

3. Claim Construction (Markman) Outcomes

• There is no public information indicating that the case has reached the claim construction (Markman) stage yet, which is typical for a case filed only a few months ago.

4. Discovery Milestones

• No specific discovery milestones with strategic significance have been publicly reported.

5. Trial Events, Verdict, and Post-trial Motions

• Given the recent filing date (March 20, 2026), the case has not yet reached trial, verdict, or post-trial motions.

6. Settlement, Dismissal, Judgment, or Appeal

• The case remains active and has not reached a final disposition such as settlement, dismissal, or judgment. No appeals have been filed.

7. Parallel PTAB IPR/PGR Proceedings

• A search of USPTO PTAB records for US Patent No. 8,964,849 (one of the asserted patents) and for US Patent 12088843 reveals no currently active or completed IPR/PGR proceedings specifically linked to these patents within the timeframe relevant to this litigation.

McKool Smith, P.C. is representing the plaintiff, Velos Media, LLC, in Velos Media, LLC v. The Walt Disney Company et al., case number 2:26-cv-03052. The firm is known for its extensive experience in intellectual property and patent litigation, having secured numerous high-value patent infringement verdicts.

The following attorneys from McKool Smith, P.C. are listed on the complaint as counsel for Velos Media, LLC:

• Warren H. Lipschitz

  • Role: Likely lead counsel or local counsel.
  • Firm: McKool Smith, P.C., Los Angeles, California.
  • Experience Note: McKool Smith is renowned for its patent litigation success, with attorneys regularly securing significant verdicts.

• Erik Fountain

  • Role: Likely lead counsel or local counsel.
  • Firm: McKool Smith, P.C., Los Angeles, California.
  • Experience Note: The firm has an unrivaled courtroom track record in intellectual property cases.

• Eric Hansen

  • Role: Likely lead counsel or local counsel.
  • Firm: McKool Smith, P.C., Los Angeles, California.
  • Experience Note: McKool Smith attorneys handle patent disputes in federal courts across various technologies and industries.

• R. Mitch Verboncoeur

  • Role: Lead counsel (pro hac vice application forthcoming).
  • Firm: McKool Smith, P.C., Dallas, Texas.
  • Experience Note: The firm's Dallas-based trial lawyers are experienced in high-stakes patent litigation.

• Samuel F. Baxter

  • Role: Lead counsel (pro hac vice application forthcoming).
  • Firm: McKool Smith, P.C., Austin, Texas.
  • Experience Note: Mr. Baxter is a highly rated patent litigator, indicated by an "L5A" rating in a related Velos Media case.

• Kevin Burgess

  • Role: Lead counsel (pro hac vice application forthcoming).
  • Firm: McKool Smith, P.C., Austin, Texas.
  • Experience Note: Mr. Burgess is involved in significant patent litigation, as evidenced by a "L5D" rating in a related Velos Media case.

• Jennifer Truelove

  • Role: Lead counsel (pro hac vice application forthcoming).
  • Firm: McKool Smith, P.C., Austin, Texas.
  • Experience Note: McKool Smith focuses on protecting clients' intellectual property assets through vigorous enforcement and defense of rights.

tool_code
print(google_search.search(queries=["Velos Media LLC v. The Walt Disney Company et al. 2:26-cv-03052 counsel", "Velos Media v. Disney docket 2:26-cv-03052", "Disney patent litigation counsel", "Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP patent litigation", "Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP patent litigation"]))
thought
The user is asking for the counsel of record representing the defendants (The Walt Disney Company et al.) in the case Velos Media, LLC v. The Walt Disney Company et al., case number 2:26-cv-03052.

I need to find the names of the attorneys, their roles, their firms and office locations, and any relevant patent litigation experience or notable past cases. I will use web search, prioritizing PACER/docket sheet information if available, and then other legal news sources and firm websites.

Given that the case was filed in March 2026 and the current date is July 2026, it is highly likely that appearances have been made.The search results indicate that counsel for the defendants, The Walt Disney Company et al., have appeared. Specifically, Gabriel K. Bell and Allison S. Blanco are mentioned in the docket.

• Gabriel K. Bell has filed an application to appear pro hac vice, which was initially found moot and then granted, designating Allison S. Blanco as local counsel. This suggests Gabriel K. Bell is likely lead counsel or a key out-of-state attorney.
• Allison S. Blanco is designated as local counsel.
• The docket also mentions "Mckool Smith, P.C." multiple times in relation to the defendants. This suggests that McKool Smith, P.C. is likely the firm representing the defendants, with Gabriel K. Bell possibly being from this firm.

I will perform additional searches to confirm the firm for Gabriel K. Bell and Allison S. Blanco, and to find more details about their roles and experience.The search results confirm that Latham & Watkins LLP represents the defendants.

• Gabriel K. Bell is identified as an attorney with Latham & Watkins LLP. He is head of the firm's Intellectual Property Appellate Practice and is described as a top IP appellate litigator, representing market-leading technology and life sciences companies in the Federal Circuit and district courts. He has argued over 30 Federal Circuit appeals and has expertise in patent eligibility under Section 101 of the Patent Act. He is appearing pro hac vice in this case. His office location is Washington, D.C..
• Allison S. Blanco is also an attorney with Latham & Watkins LLP and is designated as local counsel for the defendants. She advises clients on complex commercial issues at the intersection of business and intellectual property law, with extensive experience in licensing and commercializing IP assets, internet law, and trademark and copyright infringement litigation.

The prior search results also mentioned "Mckool Smith, P.C." in relation to defendants, but subsequent searches and more specific docket information clarify that McKool Smith, P.C. represents the plaintiff, Velos Media, LLC, not the defendants. This was a point of confusion initially but is now clarified.

Therefore, the counsel of record for the defendants are from Latham & Watkins LLP.The Walt Disney Company and its co-defendants are represented by attorneys from Latham & Watkins LLP.

The identified counsel for the defendant(s) are:

• Gabriel K. Bell (Lead Counsel, appearing Pro Hac Vice)

  • Firm: Latham & Watkins LLP (Washington, D.C. office)
  • Experience: Gabriel K. Bell heads Latham & Watkins' Intellectual Property Appellate Practice and is recognized as a leading IP appellate litigator. He represents technology and life sciences companies in Federal Circuit and district court cases, having argued over 30 Federal Circuit appeals. He possesses particular expertise in patent eligibility under Section 101 of the Patent Act.

• Allison S. Blanco (Local Counsel)

  • Firm: Latham & Watkins LLP
  • Experience: Allison S. Blanco advises clients on intricate commercial matters that bridge business and intellectual property law. Her practice includes licensing and commercializing IP assets, internet law, and litigation related to trademark and copyright infringement.

Initial docket information had suggested McKool Smith, P.C. might be involved with the defendants, but subsequent review clarifies that McKool Smith, P.C. is representing the plaintiff, Velos Media, LLC.