Counsel registry
Winston & Strawn
39 case appearances — 11 as plaintiff counsel · 28 as defendant counsel.
Firm overview
Winston & Strawn LLP: Patent Litigation Summary
April 30, 2026
Winston & Strawn LLP is a full-service international law firm headquartered in Chicago and founded in 1853. As a large "BigLaw" firm, it maintains a significant US footprint with offices in key litigation markets including California, Texas, New York, and Washington, D.C., as well as several locations in Europe and Asia. The firm consistently ranks among the top tiers of legal industry surveys; for 2026, Vault ranked Winston #39 in its list of most prestigious firms, and it is a perennial member of the AmLaw 100. The firm’s intellectual property group comprises over 100 attorneys, more than 60 of whom hold technical degrees.
The firm's patent litigation practice is nationally recognized for its work across a wide array of technologies, with particular expertise in the pharmaceutical, high-technology, and life sciences sectors. Winston has a market-leading practice in Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) litigation on behalf of generic pharmaceutical manufacturers, having appeared in over 100 such cases between 2018 and 2022. In the technology sector, the firm handles complex patent matters involving semiconductors, telecommunications, software, and medical devices. The firm also has a formidable International Trade Commission (ITC) practice, with over 80 years of collective experience in Section 337 investigations.
Winston & Strawn’s patent group predominantly represents defendants, a fact supported by the firm’s own reporting and the authoritative case data showing its single tracked appearance on the defense side. The firm describes itself as among the top three national patent defense firms by number of cases filed and appearances, according to Lex Machina data. Notable public victories include a complete defense jury verdict for Belkin against Fujitsu, a seminal § 101 win for SAP, and a noninfringement jury verdict for Teva in a case concerning Suboxone® tablets. The tracked case, Monticello Enterprises LLC v. Petco Animals Supply Stores Inc et al., is an ongoing matter in the Western District of Texas where recent court records show procedural motions underway. The lead counsel listed in that case, E. Danielle Williams, is no longer with the firm.
The firm maintains a highly active and well-regarded practice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), handling hundreds of inter partes review (IPR) and other post-grant proceedings for both patent owners and petitioners. Patexia's 2025 PTAB Intelligence Report recognized Winston's practice among the top 25 firms nationally. The firm's overall Intellectual Property practice is chaired by Dustin Edwards. Other prominent partners in the patent litigation group include Chicago-based trial lawyer George Lombardi and New York Managing Partner Krishnan Padmanabhan, who co-chairs the Technology, Media, and Telecom Industry Group.
Attorneys
Roles
- lead counsel31
- Counsel20
- of counsel17
- counsel16
- Lead Counsel15
- supporting counsel1
- associate1
- national counsel1
- back-up counsel1
- Back-Up Counsel1
- local counsel1
- Associate1
- Litigator1
- Litigation Associate1
- Partner, Co-chair of Intellectual Property Practice1
- attorney1
- Back-up counsel1
- backup counsel1
Cases (39)
- π plaintiffAbbott Laboratories et al. v. Miracor Medical SAScott M. Border · attorney
- π plaintiffAbbott Laboratories et al. v. Miracor Medical SASaranya Raghavan · Back-up counsel
- π plaintiffABBOTT LABORATORIES et al. v. Miracor Medical SA BelgiumDustin J. Edwards · lead counsel
- π plaintiffAbbott Laboratories v. Miracor Medical SAScott M. Border · lead counsel
- Δ defendantAlpha Modus Corp. v. Walgreens Co.Adam K. Mortara · lead counsel
- Δ defendantAmgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.Maureen L. Rurka · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantAtlas Global Technologies LLC v. TP-Link Corporation Limited et al.Robert N. Kang · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantAutoConnect Holdings LLC v. Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America Inc. et al.Brett Johnson · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantBSH Home Appliances Corporation v. Whirlpool CorporationRobert Vlasis III · lead counsel
- Δ defendantBunker Hill Technologies LLC v. Toyota Motor North America Inc. et al.Michael B. Johnson · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantBunker Hill Technologies LLC v. Toyota Motor North America Inc. et al.M. Brett Johnson · lead counsel
- Δ defendantCardWare Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.David Enzminger · lead counsel
- Δ defendantCyberfone Systems, LLC v. Wells Fargo & CompanyMichael J. Flynn · of counsel
- Δ defendantDataTreasury Corporation v. Bank of America CorporationGeorge C. Lombardi · lead counsel
- Δ defendantLemko Corporation v. AT&T Inc. et al.Krishnan Padmanabhan · Counsel
- Δ defendantMalikie Innovations Limited v. Core Scientific, Inc.Brian E. Ferguson · Counsel
- Δ defendantMiracor Medical SA v. Abbott Laboratories et al.Scott M. Border · lead counsel
- π plaintiffMPI Corp v. Technoprobe SPAMichael A. Bittner · lead counsel
- Δ defendantMultimedia Technologies Pte Ltd. v. Tubi, Inc.Michael A. Bittner · lead counsel
- π plaintiffNetApp, Inc. v. Valtrus Innovations Ltd. et al.Kathi Vidal · lead counsel
- Δ defendantNetlist, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc.Michael R. Rueckheim · counsel
- π plaintiffOtsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc.George C. Lombardi · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffPROFRAC SERVICES, LLC et al. v. LIBERTY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC et al.Thomas Melsheimer · lead counsel
- Δ defendantSITNETLLC v. META PLATFORMS, INC.Krishnan Padmanabhan · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffStingray IP Solutions LLC v. Bticino SPA et al.Thomas B. Walsh III · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantThales DIS France SA v. Canadian Bank Note Company Ltd et al.Stephen D. Smerek · lead counsel
- Δ defendantTurboCode LLC v. Dell Technologies Inc. et alMichael A. Bittner · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUnified Patents v. US Well Services LLCScott Border · counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseScott M. Border · lead counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseNimalka R. Wickramasekera · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseThomas M. Melsheimer · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseMichael R. Rueckheim · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseScott M. Border · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseJeffrey W. Abraham · lead counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseNimalka R. Wickramasekera · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseMichael A. Meneghini · Litigator
- Δ defendantUntitled caseRobert N. Kang · lead counsel
- Δ defendantValtrus Innovations Ltd. et al. v. FedEx Corporation et al.Katherine K. Vidal · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantVeloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc.Maureen L. Rurka · lead counsel