Counsel registry

Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders

16 case appearances — 8 as plaintiff counsel · 8 as defendant counsel.

Generating firm summary with web-search grounding — usually 30-60s. Don’t leave this page.

Attorneys

Roles

Counsel17
Lead Counsel3
local counsel3
lead counsel3
counsel3
Of Counsel2
pro hac vice counsel1
Local Counsel1

Cases (16)

Δ defendantABC IP, LLC et al. v. TURNER’S OUTDOORSMAN, INC., DBA TURNER’S OUTDOORSMANStephen C. Hall · Lead Counsel
Δ defendantAmgen Inc. v. Amneal LLC et al.Stephanie L. Jonaitis · counsel
π plaintiffCerence Operating Company v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al.Charles S. Baker · local counsel
π plaintiffCerence Operating Company v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al.Charles S. Baker · local counsel
π plaintiffCerence Operating Company v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al.Charles S. Baker · Lead Counsel
π plaintiffCerence Operating Company v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al.Charles S. Baker · local counsel
π plaintiffCerence Operating Company v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al.Charles S. Baker · lead counsel
Δ defendantIntellectual Ventures v. Capital OneRobert A. Angle · Counsel
π plaintiffMianyang BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v. Samsung Display Co., Ltd.Andrew P. Zappia · Counsel
π plaintiffShoals Technologies Group, LLC v. Voltage, LLCWilliam Belanger · Lead Counsel
π plaintiffSoundClear Technologies LLC v. Google, LLCDabney J. Carr IV · Local Counsel
Δ defendantUntitled caseMark A. Hannemann · Counsel
Δ defendantUntitled caseTim Tingkang Xia · lead counsel
Δ defendantUntitled caseRyan Edward Dornberger · counsel
Δ defendantUntitled caseAndrew P. Zappia · lead counsel
Δ defendantUntitled caseLaura Anne Kuykendall · Counsel

Further reading

Patent term and expiration
Patents don't last forever. They don't even reliably last 20 years. The expiration date that actually matters depends on the earliest filing date, the maintenance schedule, and any USPTO or FDA delays the patent owner can claim back.
Examples of NPE shell companies: how patent trolls structure their entities
The shell company is the patent troll's signature legal artifact. Knowing the structures lets you read the litigation strategy off the corporate filing.
Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. (2002)
Narrow your claim during prosecution and you presumptively give up the equivalents in between. The presumption is rebuttable, but in practice the prosecution history is a defendant's gold mine.
The Patent Scam (2017): a documentary on the patent troll industry
Most people learn about patent trolls only when they get sued by one. The Patent Scam does the work of making the problem concrete before that happens.
Lumen View v. FindTheBest (2013-2016): when a defendant fought back, the troll paid
Same patent. Same plaintiff playbook. Different outcome — because the defendant had the resources and the will to fight. Most don't. That's the asymmetry this site is built to fix.

All resources →