Counsel registry
The Shore Firm
11 case appearances — 9 as plaintiff counsel · 2 as defendant counsel.
Firm overview
The Shore Firm is a Dallas, Texas-based boutique law firm recognized for its intellectual property litigation and licensing practice. The firm describes itself as "small by choice" and focuses on complex and technologically demanding matters. Its IP practice emphasizes the commercialization of patent portfolios, representing both IP owners in enforcement suits and, at times, defending those accused of infringement.
The firm specializes in a broad range of technology areas, including semiconductors, wireless communications, database software, computer hardware, medical devices, and telecommunications. Their work often involves representing non-profit research institutions and universities in commercializing and enforcing their intellectual property. The Shore Firm's case history reflects a strong preference for plaintiff-side representation, with 9 out of 11 tracked appearances as plaintiff's counsel, compared to 2 as defendant's counsel. This aligns with their business model of often taking cases on a contingency fee basis and operating a reverse-engineering laboratory to support complex patent enforcement.
Notable patent litigation matters include representing Personal Audio LLC in a suit against Google LLC concerning audio patents, where a jury initially awarded $15.1 million, though the verdict was later rejected by the court. The firm also represented EXPRESS MOBILE, INC. in disputes over website generation tools, including a $40 million jury verdict against Shopify Inc. that was subsequently overturned on judgment as a matter of law. The Shore Firm has also secured significant verdicts for clients, such as a $32.5 million patent verdict for Purdue against STMicroelectronics in December 2023 and a $42 million patent verdict against Boston Scientific Corporation in February 2023.
The Shore Firm engages in proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) as part of its comprehensive IP litigation strategy. Their involvement is evidenced by cases like Personal Audio LLC v. Google LLC and EXPRESS MOBILE, INC. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly eBay Inc.), which have included PTAB inter partes review (IPR) proceedings that were subsequently appealed to the Federal Circuit. In one instance, an IPR was filed by Apple Inc. against HBCU Messaging US LP's mobile messaging patent, where The Shore Firm represents HBCU Messaging.
Key figures in the firm's IP litigation practice include Michael W. Shore, a founding partner who has been involved in 8 of the firm's tracked cases and is noted for his focus on IP commercialization and a track record of significant jury verdicts. Zachary Della Porta, an associate, is also prominently involved, appearing in 8 tracked cases, including HBCU Messaging US LP v. Apple Inc. et al.
Attorneys
Roles
- Counsel7
- lead counsel3
- Lead Counsel3
- Attorney3
- Local Counsel2
- Of Counsel1
- counsel1
Cases (11)
- π plaintiffCM HK Limited v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al.Michael Wayne Shore · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffEXPRESS MOBILE, INC. v. eBay Inc.Michael W. Shore · Lead Counsel
- π plaintiffHBCU Messaging US LP v. Apple Inc. et al.Michael W. Shore · lead counsel
- π plaintiffPersonal Audio LLC v. Google LLCMichael W. Shore · lead counsel
- Δ defendantSamsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. CM HK LimitedMichael Wayne Shore · Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseMichael W. Shore · Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseMichael W. Shore · lead counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseMichael W. Shore · Counsel
- π plaintiffUntitled caseZachary Della Porta · Attorney
- π plaintiffUntitled caseMichael Shore · Lead Counsel
- Δ defendantUntitled caseMichael W. Shore · Local Counsel