Invalidity dossier

US 9999084

Associated device discovery in IMS networks

Current assignee: Aylus Networks Inc

Added 10/14/2026, 12:01:09 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US9999084B2

Title: Associated device discovery in IMS networks

Patent number: US9999084B2
Application number: US14/663,584
Publication (grant): 2018-06-12 (application published as US20150195862A1 on 2015-07-09)
Priority date: 2005-06-24 (claimed from US11/166,407); a second priority claim from US11/282,924 (2005-11-18) is also listed.
Filing date: 2015-03-20
Inventors: Shamim A. Naqvi; Prasad S. Dorbala; Ellis L. Wong; Mahesh N. Ganmukhi
Assignee: Aylus Networks Inc (original and current, per the source listing)
Legal status: Expired – Fee Related; adjusted expiration 2025-07-23. The source notes legal status is an assumption, not a legal conclusion.

Purpose (per the supplied text): The invention "generally relates to IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) networks and, more specifically, to IMS users that use (perhaps multiple) discovered user endpoint devices." The excerpt frames this against the evolution from circuit-switched voice (BTS, BSC, MSC, GMSC, SS7) to overlay packet data (PCF) and 2.5G/3G multimedia, where the handset's IP context is maintained while powered on and connected—unlike traditional telephony, where connection state exists only during a call. It also notes the service logic–application server connection is "stateful" and must be maintained for the duration.

Plain-language scope (from the excerpt): The patent concerns discovering user endpoint devices associated with an IMS user, in a setting where a subscriber may employ more than one device. The excerpt characterizes IMS as supporting both voice and data services and describes the stateful nature of application-server connections.

Classifications (selected, per source): H04L65/1016 (IMS); H04W76/15 (multiple wireless link connections); H04M7/123 (packet-switched IMS-type network interconnection); H04W4/80 (short-range services); H04W88/06 (multi-mode terminals).

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US9999084](/patent/US9999084)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It provides no claims, no detailed description of discovery mechanisms, no figures, and no named prior-art references. It does not establish claim scope, validity, inventorship disputes, or ownership transfers; the excerpt is partial, so omitted text may qualify the above.

Generated 10/14/2026, 12:01:52 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9999084. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.