Invalidity dossier

US 9788305

Method and apparatus for processing bandwidth intensive data streams using virtual media access control and physical layers

Current assignee: Xifi Networks R & D Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 5:15:27 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 9,788,305 B2

Title: Method and apparatus for processing bandwidth intensive data streams using virtual media access control and physical layers

Assignee / Inventor: Current assignee listed as Xifi Networks R and D Inc; inventor Sai C. Manapragada. Originally assigned to an individual; a 2023-08-02 reassignment to XIFI NETWORKS R&D INC. is recorded (noted as source data, without analysis).

Dates: Priority date 2013-10-30; application US 14/526,792 filed 2014-10-29; published as US20150117367A1 on 2015-04-30; granted 2017-10-10; status Active, adjusted expiration 2035-03-19.

Purpose (plain language): The patent addresses wireless networks handling high-bandwidth multimedia. It describes inserting a "processing layer" between an application layer and the actual MAC and PHY layers. This processing layer defines virtual MAC and virtual PHY layers that pool multiple real wireless transceiver resources (radios/receivers) and allocate their combined bandwidth to satisfy the peak bandwidth demands of several concurrently running applications—rather than binding each application to a single radio. Example: per-transceiver bandwidth is 300 Mbps, so Application A's 450 Mbps demand is met by one full transceiver plus half of a second, and Application D's demand by two transceivers plus half of a third.

Stated scope (from the excerpt's own summary): A wireless networking system with an application layer, first and second transceiver resources each having an actual bandwidth, and a processing layer that evaluates requirements and availabilities, including a bandwidth allocator allocating portions of each actual bandwidth to virtual MAC and PHY layers. Also described: a method of operating such a transceiver system, and a wireless transceiver for a duplex link with a programmable data transfer cycle exhibiting an asymmetric transmit/receive profile. Classifications include H04W72/02 and H04W72/0453.

What the excerpt does not establish: It is explicitly an excerpt with text omitted mid-sentence regarding unavailable-resource handling; it does not provide the full claims, complete figures, the entire specification, a complete assignee/ownership chain, or any legal conclusion on validity or enforceability.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9788305/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:43 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9788305. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.