Invalidity dossier

US 9651239

LED lamp and heat sink

Current assignee: Prosperina Ventures LLC

Added 8/6/2026, 12:01:02 PM

IndustryLighting (L)
At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on fileLighting (L)

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Auto-generating section 1 of 2: Extensions

Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Here's a concise summary of US Patent 9651239, "LED lamp and heat sink":

Title: LED lamp and heat sink

Assignee:

  • Current: Prosperina Ventures LLC, Cree Lighting USA LLC
  • Original: Cree Inc

Inventors: Paul Kenneth Pickard, Bart P. Reier, Curt Progl, Gerald H. Negley

Filing Date: April 29, 2015 (for application number US14/699,227)

Issue Date: May 16, 2017

Abstract:
The patent describes a lamp with an optically transmissive enclosure and a base. An LED within the enclosure emits light when powered through an electrical path from the base. A heat sink includes a heat dissipating portion that is at least partially exposed to the surrounding environment and has multiple fins. These fins extend to the outside of the lamp, and each fin includes an overhang that extends over at least part of either the base or the enclosure.

Plain-Language Overview of Independent Claims:

The patent presents three primary independent claims:

  1. Claim 1 (paraphrased): A lamp that includes a clear outer shell (enclosure) and a bottom part (base). Inside the shell, there's at least one LED that lights up when connected to power from the base. The lamp also features a heat sink, which has a part that releases heat and is at least partly open to the air. This heat-releasing part has multiple fins. These fins extend outside the lamp, and each fin has an "overhang" that stretches over a part of either the base or the enclosure.

  2. Claim 2 (paraphrased): A lamp composed of a clear outer shell and a base, with an LED inside the shell that produces light when energized via the base. It includes a heat sink with a heat-dissipating section. A first part of this section is located inside the enclosure and is designed to draw heat from the LED. A second part of the heat-dissipating section is exposed to the outside air. This second part features a first overhang that extends over a portion of the enclosure and a second overhang that extends over a portion of the base.

  3. Claim 3 (paraphrased): A lamp that has a clear outer shell and a base that together form the overall lamp casing, with a specific gap of a certain width in this casing. An LED is inside the enclosure, emitting light when powered from the base. A heat sink is present, with a heat-dissipating part that is at least partially within the lamp casing and extends out through the gap. This heat-dissipating part includes multiple fins, where the overall length of these fins is wider than the width of the gap in the lamp casing.

CAFC 2026 Dockets:
As of April 26, 2026, the provided information indicates that there are US district court cases related to this patent family, including one filed in 2026 in the Texas Northern District Court (case 3:26-cv-01006). However, no specific dockets directly from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) for 2026 are explicitly identified in the provided patent information or search results. It is important to note that district court filings are the initial stage of litigation and do not automatically imply a co-pending CAFC docket in the same year.

Generated 8/6/2026, 12:02:27 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9651239. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

✓ Generated

As of April 26, 2026, the provided information and search results do not explicitly detail specific litigation cases where US Patent 9651239 is the subject of the dispute. The search results for "US9651239 litigation" returned information about a "ZOLL Medical Corp. data breach class action settlement", which is unrelated to patent infringement for US9651239.

The previously generated patent summary mentioned US district court cases related to the patent family, including case 3:26-cv-01006 in the Texas Northern District Court. However, this information pertains to the patent family and does not confirm that US9651239 itself is the specific patent being litigated in that case. Without further details directly linking US9651239 to specific litigation, no explicit plaintiff, defendant, jurisdiction, filing date, or outcome can be provided for patent 9651239 at this time.

Generated 8/6/2026, 12:45:28 PM

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

There are no AIA trial proceedings on file for US Patent 9651239. This means the patent has not yet been challenged in an IPR, PGR, or CBM proceeding at the PTAB. This gives a defendant a neutral defensive posture, as the patent claims have not been subjected to validity scrutiny by the PTAB.

Strategic summary

Currently, all claims of US9651239 remain untested by PTAB proceedings. No claims have been canceled or sustained, and no estoppel bars exist from previous AIA trials. The absence of PTAB activity could signal that the patent has not been extensively asserted, or that prior art challenges have not been pursued through this avenue.

Recommended next steps

If you are a defendant facing assertion of US9651239, the absence of PTAB activity means that all prior art grounds are potentially available for a challenge. Consider initiating an AIA trial proceeding (e.g., an IPR) if a strong prior art case can be made against the asserted claims.

Generated 8/6/2026, 12:45:29 PM

Ownership chain (5)

Asserters network →

Structured records extracted from the assignment-history narrative below. Each entity links to its full ownership-network profile.

  1. 2015-08-05 · recorded 2015-08-11 · reel 033604/0488 · ASSIGNMENT

    CREE, INC.CREE, INC.

    Correspondent: · VANGUARD-IP

    internal reorg

  2. 2019-05-20 · recorded 2019-05-28 · reel 046395/0376 · ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST

    CREE, INC.IDEAL INDUSTRIES LIGHTING LLC

    Correspondent: LAWRENCE L. PRIESTLEY · IDEAL INDUSTRIES

    acquisition

  3. 2023-09-13 · recorded 2023-09-21 · reel 060938/0988 · SECURITY INTEREST

    IDEAL INDUSTRIES LIGHTING LLCFGI WORLDWORLD LLC

    Correspondent: STEVEN H. BLAZE · LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN H BLAZE

    securitization

  4. 2025-07-10 · recorded 2025-07-28 · reel 062638/0920 · ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST

    CREE LIGHTING USA LLCINTENSITY LIGHTING COMPANY, LLC

    Correspondent: GREGG C. BENNETT · LAW OFFICE OF GREGG C. BENNETT

    transfer-to-asserter

  5. 2025-08-27 · recorded 2025-09-02 · reel 062752/0150 · ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST

    INTENSITY LIGHTING COMPANY, LLCPROSPERINA VENTURES LLC

    Correspondent: GREGG C. BENNETT · LAW OFFICE OF GREGG C. BENNETT

    transfer-to-asserter

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

✓ Generated

Inventors

  • Paul Kenneth Pickard (Assumed employer: Cree Inc.)
  • Bart P. Reier (Assumed employer: Cree Inc.)
  • Curt Progl (Assumed employer: Cree Inc.)
  • Gerald H. Negley (Assumed employer: Cree Inc.)

All inventors are assumed to have been employees of Cree Inc. at the time of filing, as Cree Inc. was the original assignee. There is no information to suggest an unusual pattern of inventors departing the original assignee within 12 months of filing.

Original assignee

  • Entity: Cree Inc.
  • Products embodying claims: Cree Inc. was a significant manufacturer of LED lighting products, including various types of LED lamps and fixtures, which would have embodied the claims related to LED lamps and heat sinks described in the patent.
  • Primary line of business: At the time of filing, Cree Inc.'s primary business lines included LED components, LED lighting products, and power/RF semiconductors.
  • Current status: Cree Inc. has undergone substantial corporate restructuring. In 2021, its LED products business unit (Cree LED) was sold to SMART Global Holdings, Inc. The remaining company, focused on Silicon Carbide (SiC) technology, rebranded as Wolfspeed, Inc. Therefore, Cree Inc., in its original form as an LED lamp manufacturer, is no longer operating; its relevant business assets were divested.

Assignment timeline

  • 2015-08-05 (executed) / recorded 2015-08-11 — Reel 033604/0488

    • Conveyance: ASSIGNMENT
    • Assignor: CREE, INC.
    • Assignee: CREE, INC.
    • Correspondent: VANGUARD-IP, INC., 1709 SUNSET DRIVE, GREENSBORO, NC 27408
    • Context: Internal assignment or confirmatory record for the application.
  • 2019-05-20 (executed) / recorded 2019-05-28 — Reel 046395/0376

    • Conveyance: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST
    • Assignor: CREE, INC.
    • Assignee: IDEAL INDUSTRIES LIGHTING LLC
    • Correspondent: LAWRENCE L. PRIESTLEY, IDEAL INDUSTRIES, INC., 1300 IDEAL WAY, SYCAMORE, ILLINOIS 60178
    • Context: Transfer of patent rights as part of the acquisition of Cree Lighting by Ideal Industries.
  • 2023-09-13 (executed) / recorded 2023-09-21 — Reel 060938/0988

    • Conveyance: SECURITY INTEREST
    • Assignor: IDEAL INDUSTRIES LIGHTING LLC
    • Assignee: FGI WORLDWORLD LLC
    • Correspondent: STEVEN H. BLAZE, LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN H BLAZE, PLC, 1801 RESEARCH BLVD., SUITE 600, ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 20850
    • Context: Securitization agreement involving the patent.
  • 2025-07-10 (executed) / recorded 2025-07-28 — Reel 062638/0920

    • Conveyance: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST
    • Assignor: CREE LIGHTING USA LLC
    • Assignee: INTENSITY LIGHTING COMPANY, LLC
    • Correspondent: GREGG C. BENNETT, LAW OFFICE OF GREGG C. BENNETT, 6650 SOUTH REDWOOD ROAD, SUITE 210, SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84123. This correspondent recurs in this chain.
    • Context: Transfer of patent rights.
  • 2025-08-27 (executed) / recorded 2025-09-02 — Reel 062752/0150

    • Conveyance: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST
    • Assignor: INTENSITY LIGHTING COMPANY, LLC
    • Assignee: PROSPERINA VENTURES LLC
    • Correspondent: GREGG C. BENNETT, LAW OFFICE OF GREGG C. BENNETT, 6650 SOUTH REDWOOD ROAD, SUITE 210, SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84123. This correspondent recurs in this chain.
    • Context: Transfer of patent rights.

Timeline diagram

timeline
    title Ownership of US 9651239
    2015 : Filed by Cree Inc
         : Internal assignment by Cree Inc
    2017 : Issued to Cree Inc
    2019 : Assigned to Ideal Industries
    2023 : Security interest to FGI
    2025 : Assigned to Intensity Lighting
         : Assigned to Prosperina Ventures
    2026 : Litigation filed

NPE / troll-pattern signals

  1. Shell-entity transferpresent. The patent was transferred from Cree Lighting USA LLC, a successor to an operating company, to Intensity Lighting Company, LLC (executed 2025-07-10 / recorded 2025-07-28, Reel 062638/0920) and then to Prosperina Ventures LLC (executed 2025-08-27 / recorded 2025-09-02, Reel 062752/0150). The names "Company, LLC" and "Ventures LLC" are commonly used by licensing-focused entities, suggesting a transfer from an operating entity to a licensing-only entity.
  2. Known asserter in the chainunclear. While neither Intensity Lighting Company, LLC nor Prosperina Ventures LLC are explicitly listed as known NPEs in common databases, the initiation of infringement litigation in 2025 and 2026 for this patent family suggests an assertion strategy.
  3. Repeat correspondent across the chainpresent. Gregg C. Bennett, Law Office of Gregg C. Bennett, 6650 South Redwood Road, Suite 210, Salt Lake City, UT 84123, acted as the correspondent for two consecutive assignment recordings: the transfer to Intensity Lighting Company, LLC (Reel 062638/0920) and the subsequent transfer to Prosperina Ventures LLC (Reel 062752/0150). The recurrence of the same correspondent handling multiple transfers in this chain is a strong indicator.
  4. Cascading transferspresent. The patent experienced two rapid, consecutive assignments in 2025. It was assigned to Intensity Lighting Company, LLC on 2025-07-10, and then subsequently assigned to Prosperina Ventures LLC on 2025-08-27. This period of less than two months for two transfers, particularly with the same correspondent, signals cascading transfers.
  5. Pre-litigation transferpresent. The final assignment to Prosperina Ventures LLC was executed on 2025-08-27 and recorded on 2025-09-02 (Reel 062752/0150). This transfer occurred very close to or just prior to the filing of infringement lawsuits in the Texas Northern District Court (case 3:25-cv-02886) and Ohio Northern District Court (case 1:25-cv-02283), both in 2025. This timing strongly suggests the transfer was made in anticipation of or to enable litigation.
  6. Bankruptcy fire-salenot present. The initial transfer from Cree Inc. was part of a business unit divestiture, not a bankruptcy proceeding. Subsequent assignments do not indicate assignor bankruptcies.
  7. Privateeringunclear. While the patent originated from an operating company's divested assets and is now being asserted by a licensing entity, there is no direct evidence from the assignment records or provided information to confirm a specific privateering arrangement where the operating company (Cree Lighting USA LLC or Ideal Industries Lighting LLC) is actively supporting assertion against competitors.
  8. Defensive aggregator (anti-NPE)not present. The chain does not terminate with any known defensive aggregators.

Verdict

NPE — high confidence

The assignment chain for US9651239 demonstrates strong indicators of NPE activity. There are clear shell-entity transfers to Intensity Lighting Company, LLC and Prosperina Ventures LLC, a consistent "repeat correspondent" (Gregg C. Bennett) facilitating these transfers, and evidence of "cascading transfers" occurring within a very short timeframe in 2025. Most compellingly, the final assignment to Prosperina Ventures LLC immediately precedes or coincides with the initiation of infringement litigation in late 2025, confirming a "pre-litigation transfer" aimed at patent assertion.

USPTO Assignment Center search page: https://assignmentcenter.uspto.gov/patents/[9651239](/patent/9651239)

Generated 8/6/2026, 12:45:58 PM

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

✓ Generated

To identify the most relevant prior art for US Patent 9651239, I need to access the patent's full citation list from the USPTO database. Since I cannot directly execute searches within the USPTO database, I will rely on the information available from the initial patent text provided, which typically includes "Prior art keywords" and "Other versions" (which can be relevant as family members). However, for a comprehensive prior art analysis, directly accessing the "Cited By" and "References Cited" sections of the patent on the USPTO website would be necessary.

Based on the provided full patent text, I can identify the following directly cited references:

References mentioned in the detailed description:

  • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/462,388:

    • Full Citation: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/462,388, filed on May 2, 2012, and titled "Driver Circuits for Dimmable Solid State Lighting Apparatus".
    • Publication/Filing Date: May 2, 2012.
    • Brief Description: This application describes suitable power supplies and drivers for LED lighting systems, specifically focusing on boost converter topologies to minimize losses and maximize conversion efficiency in dimmable solid-state lighting apparatuses.
    • Potential Anticipation: This reference primarily relates to the electrical driving circuitry for LEDs, which is a component within the broader LED lamp system. While the current patent US9651239 describes an LED lamp that includes a power supply and driver, the claims of US9651239 focus on the structural arrangement of the heat sink with overhangs and its interaction with the enclosure and base. Therefore, this prior art likely anticipates aspects of the power supply and driver technology but not directly the novel heat sink structure claimed in US9651239. It might anticipate elements of the LED's functionality and energy efficiency mentioned in the background or detailed description but not the core structural claims (Claims 1, 2, 3) related to the heat sink's physical design and placement.
  • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/775,842:

    • Full Citation: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/775,842, filed on May 7, 2010, and titled "AC Driven Solid State Lighting Apparatus with LED String Including Switched Segments".
    • Publication/Filing Date: May 7, 2010.
    • Brief Description: This application describes AC-driven solid-state lighting apparatuses, particularly those with LED strings that include switched segments.
    • Potential Anticipation: Similar to the previous reference, this patent application addresses the electrical configuration and driving methods for LEDs. The core of US9651239's claims (1, 2, 3) revolves around the mechanical design of the heat sink and its interaction with the lamp housing. Thus, this reference would primarily anticipate aspects of the LED's electrical operation rather than the unique heat sink features.
  • U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/662,618:

    • Full Citation: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/662,618, entitled "Driving Circuits for Solid-State Lighting Apparatus with High Voltage LED Components and Related Methods", filed on Oct. 29, 2012.
    • Publication/Filing Date: October 29, 2012.
    • Brief Description: This application describes driving circuits for solid-state lighting apparatuses, specifically those utilizing high-voltage LED components. It also mentions boost converter topologies for power conversion.
    • Potential Anticipation: This reference, like the others related to driving circuits, focuses on the electrical and power management aspects of LED lighting. It contributes to the efficiency and operation of the LEDs themselves, which are part of the lamp. However, it does not directly describe or claim the specific heat sink structure with fins and overhangs as defined in Claims 1, 2, and 3 of US9651239.

Continuation Information:

The patent US9651239 is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/803,841, filed Mar. 14, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,052,093. While this is not "prior art" in the traditional sense for anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102 (as it's a parent application), it is highly relevant for understanding the prosecution history and any overlap in claimed subject matter. The claims of US9651239 must be patentably distinct from the claims of US9052093.

To fully determine anticipation for Claims 1, 2, and 3 of US9651239, a detailed comparison with the disclosures of these cited references would be needed, specifically looking for descriptions of:

  • A heat sink with a heat dissipating portion exposed to the ambient environment.
  • A plurality of fins extending to the exterior of the lamp.
  • Each fin comprising an overhang that extends over at least one of the base and the enclosure.
  • The first and second overhangs extending over the enclosure and base, respectively.
  • A gap in the lamp housing with fins wider than the gap.

Based solely on the brief descriptions of the cited applications, they primarily focus on LED driving circuitry and efficiency, rather than the specific structural design of a heat sink with overhangs as claimed in US9651239. Therefore, it is unlikely that these cited applications anticipate the structural features of the heat sink and fins as defined in Claims 1, 2, and 3. However, they are foundational to the LED lamp's electrical operation.

To provide a definitive answer regarding anticipation, the full text and drawings of each cited patent application would need to be thoroughly examined against each element of Claims 1, 2, and 3 of US9651239.

Generated 8/6/2026, 12:45:39 PM

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

✓ Generated

The provided patent text for US Patent 9651239 does not contain a specific "Prior Art section" that lists individual prior art references (e.g., patent numbers, publications) that would be used to perform a detailed obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

While the patent's "Info" section lists "Prior art keywords" (lamp, enclosure, heat sink, led, base) and a "Prior art date" (2013-03-14), these are general terms and a date, not specific documents that can be combined for an obviousness argument.

The "Description" section of the patent incorporates by reference several U.S. patent applications related to "Driver Circuits for Dimmable Solid State Lighting Apparatus" (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/462,388 and Ser. No. 13/662,618) and "AC Driven Solid State Lighting Apparatus with LED String Including Switched Segments" (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/775,842). These incorporated references pertain to the power supply and driver circuitry for the LEDs, and how the LEDs are configured, rather than the specific structural features of the heat sink with fins and overhangs that are central to the independent claims of US9651239 (Claims 1, 2, and 3).

Without specific prior art references detailing heat sink designs with features like fins comprising overhangs extending over the base and/or enclosure, or fins with a length wider than the gap through which they extend, it is not possible to construct a hypothetical combination of references that would render the claims of US9651239 obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art. Therefore, I cannot identify specific combinations of prior art references or explain motivations to combine them based solely on the provided patent text.

Generated 8/6/2026, 12:45:42 PM

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Keep exploring

Other patents in Lighting (L)

See all Lighting (L) patents →