Invalidity dossier

US 9538569

Added 9/23/2026, 1:42:41 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US9538569B2 — Concise Patent Overview

Title: Data transfer between wireless devices
Patent number: US9538569B2
Application number: US14/921,736
Inventors: Alan G. Carlton; Alexander Reznik
Current/Original Assignee: InterDigital Patent Holdings Inc
Priority date: 2008-12-23
Filing date: 2015-10-23
Publication date (grant): 2017-01-03
Anticipated expiration: 2029-12-22
Legal status: Active
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US9538569](/patent/US9538569)/en

Purpose. The patent addresses cumbersome, multi-step file transfers between devices. The supplied text states that existing transfers via email or MMS, using GPRS or WLAN, remain fragmented, requiring adaptation between multiple implementations, which inhibits regular use "in spontaneous situations." It therefore proposes "a simplified and more intuitive approach to data transfer between devices."

Plain-language scope. Per the supplied definitions, a method controls data communication in wireless communications by: (1) detecting environment information relating to at least one candidate WTRU (wireless transmit/receive unit) operating in a local area associated with the WTRU; (2) receiving a user input via a user interface selecting data for transfer and/or an identified target WTRU; (3) processing the user input together with candidate-WTRU information; and (4) identifying at least one target WTRU from the candidate WTRUs based in part on the user input. Candidate-WTRU information is solicited through a lower layer; environment information identifies the target WTRU; and transmission instructions enable data transmission to it. Figures describe a sending/receiving WTRU, a wireless communication environment, a target discrimination algorithm, a communication method, physical layer security, and user inputs including directional indication of a target's location (FIG. 8) and transfer to multiple receiving devices (FIG. 9).

What the excerpt does not establish. The supplied text is explicitly an excerpt with omitted portions; it does not include the full claims, detailed description, or drawings. Therefore it does not establish claim scope or limitations, the number of claims, priority-chain details beyond those listed, enablement or validity, or any litigation. Litigation, ownership transfers, validity, and prior art were not researched per instructions.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:54 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9538569. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.