Invalidity dossier

US 9073531

Motor control device and vehicle brake hydraulic pressure control apparatus

Current assignee: Autoliv Nissin Brake Systems Japan Co Ltd

Added 9/23/2026, 11:03:56 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 9,073,531 B2

Title: Motor control device and vehicle brake hydraulic pressure control apparatus

Patent number / application: US 9,073,531 B2; application US 14/016,956; publication US 2014/0060038 A1

Inventor: Nobuyuki Nomura

Assignee: Original assignee Nissin Kogyo Co., Ltd.; current assignee listed as Autoliv Nissin Brake Systems Japan Co., Ltd. (per the source's assignee listing)

Key dates: Priority date 2012-09-05; filing date 2013-09-03; publication date 2015-07-07; anticipated expiration 2033-09-03. Legal status shown as Active.

Purpose: The invention relates to a motor control device that controls a motor by monitoring voltage between the motor's terminals, and to a vehicle brake hydraulic pressure control apparatus incorporating it. Motor rotation state is detected to control motor revolutions and/or detect motor abnormality, and rotation state can be determined from the motor's counter electromotive force obtained by detecting the terminal voltage. The stated aim is to make it possible to easily detect motor terminal voltage irrespective of the motor's driving frequency. One described benefit: even if driving frequency is increased (reducing operating noise), terminal voltage can still be detected during an off period.

Plain-language scope: A driving controller performs on/off control of the motor at a first period. Separately, an off control is performed with a second period longer than the first, so terminal voltage can be sampled during an off time. Off control is initiated a predetermined time before the voltage acquisition timing, so the terminal voltage has stabilized when acquired, allowing high-accuracy acquisition. The vehicle example is a vehicle behavior control apparatus (100) with a hydraulic pressure unit (10), controller (20), sensors (wheel speed, steering angle, lateral acceleration, yaw rate), and a common motor (9) driving pumps.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9073531/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not show the full claims, complete description, drawings' contents, or the specific numerical values/algorithms, and omits much of the hydraulic circuit description. Classifications, legal status, and assignee entries are noted as assumptions in the source.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:32:54 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9073531. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.