Invalidity dossier

US 8806638

Systems and methods for protecting networks from infected computing devices

Current assignee: CA Inc

Added 9/21/2026, 9:35:05 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US8806638B1

Title: Systems and methods for protecting networks from infected computing devices

Patent number: US8806638B1
Application number: US12/965,075
Inventor: SivaShakthivel Mani
Original assignee: Symantec Corporation (later reassigned to CA, Inc. per the source listing; current assignee listed as CA Inc)
Priority/filing date: 2010-12-10
Publication (grant) date: 2014-08-12
Status listed: Active, with an adjusted expiration of 2033-01-15

Purpose: The patent addresses the problem that malware-infected computers threaten other machines on a network, since an infection can spread via email or other electronic communication. Conventional protection systems may simply quarantine a device by disabling its network card, cutting off all connectivity. The disclosed approach instead seeks to quarantine the device while still letting it reach network nodes that can help neutralize the malware.

Plain-language scope (from the supplied excerpt): A computing system is given a first level of access to a network and is managed by an endpoint management system that controls that access. The system determines that the computing device is infected with malware and cannot autonomously neutralize it—for example, anti-malware software runs, fails, and a flag is set that the endpoint management system reads. In response, the endpoint management system modifies a network access control policy to reduce the device to a second, more limited level of access. This may be implemented by transmitting a firewall policy that denies all incoming and outgoing connections except to the endpoint management system (e.g., permitting downloads of updated anti-malware definitions and health reporting), blocks application access to system files, and blocks local removable devices and local or remote printers/scanners. Enforcement continues until the malware is neutralized. A corresponding system includes an access-control module and a determining module.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US8806638](/patent/US8806638)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It provides no claims text, no detailed description, no drawings, and no prior-art references. It does not establish claim scope or validity, and per instructions it does not cover litigation, ownership transfers, or prior art. Details such as dependent claims, embodiments, and figures are not available in the excerpt.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:02:07 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8806638. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.