Invalidity dossier

US 8797198

Linearized optical digital-to-analog modulator

Current assignee: Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd

Added 9/23/2026, 11:01:57 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US8797198B2

Title: Linearized optical digital-to-analog modulator
Patent number: US8797198B2
Application number: US13/280,371
Inventor(s): Yossef Ehrlichman, Ofer Amrani, Shlomo Ruschin
Original/current assignee (as listed): Ramot at Tel Aviv University Ltd.
Priority date (listed as an assumption): 2007-06-13
Filing date: 2011-10-25
Publication date: 2014-08-05 (application published as US20120081245A1 on 2012-04-05)
Legal status (as listed; not a legal conclusion): Active, adjusted expiration 2029-03-12
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US8797198](/patent/US8797198)/en

Purpose and plain-language scope (from supplied text only):
The patent concerns an optical digital-to-analog modulator that is "linearized." The supplied excerpt identifies prior-art keywords — modulator, actuating, electrodes, electrode, optical signal — indicating the subject matter involves an optical modulator whose electrodes are actuated to act on an optical signal. Classifications place it in optical digital-to-analog conversion (G02F7/00), optical modulation via interference in waveguide structures (G02F1/225), digital intensity/amplitude modulation (H04B10/541), and digital-to-analog converters (H03M1/66). The title implies the modulator converts a digital input into an analog optical output while improving linearity. The excerpt does not contain the claims or detailed description, so the specific structural arrangement, number of electrodes, actuation scheme, and linearization technique are not established here.

What the excerpt does not establish:
The excerpt does not supply the claims, written description, drawings, or prosecution history. It does not establish the actual scope of any claim, the specific linearization mechanism, or the number/configuration of electrodes beyond the keyword list. The priority date, legal status, and expiration are expressly flagged in the source as assumptions, not legal conclusions. The listed litigation, PTAB, and reassignment entries (including the security-interest assignment to PBLM RTAU LLC) appear in the source but are outside this overview's scope per the stated instructions and are not analyzed here. No validity, enforceability, or prior-art conclusions are drawn.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:32:59 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8797198. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.