Invalidity dossier

US 8784180

Added 9/23/2026, 5:43:10 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 8,784,180 B2

Title: System and Method for Play of a Network-Based Lottery Game

Patent number / kind code: US8784180B2
Application number: US13/485,483
Inventor: Edward J. Stanek
Original assignee: Scientific Games International, Inc.
Current assignee (per listing): Scientific Games LLC
Priority / filing date: 2012-05-31
Grant (publication) date: 2014-07-22
Anticipated expiration (listed): 2032-05-31
Legal status listed: Active

Purpose: The patent addresses player perceptions and apprehension about Internet-based lotteries—an open question given that conventional state-sponsored instant ("scratch-off") ticket players "will readily accept and quickly transition to a purely network-based system," where even losing a small percentage of players can have significant economic impact.

Plain-language scope: Lottery tickets are provided to players, for example at an authorized point-of-sale retail establishment. Each ticket includes a code enabling the player to access a game site on a server system over a communication network such as the Internet, via a network-enabled device (personal computer, smart phone, PDA, or the like). A game result file is assigned to the player from a finite set of game result files maintained by the server system (for example, 250,000 or 1,000,000 files), each having a unique identifier and a predetermined game outcome; assignment is randomly determined. The outcome is displayed to the player and, for a winning play, the unique identifier is transmitted to the player for redemption. An identical set of game result files is held by a gaming authority host computer system, which uses the identifier to retrieve the corresponding file and confirm the redemption claim—without needing to communicate with the network server system that assigned the file. The identifier may be an alpha-numeric code, bar code, or QR code, printed or presented electronically.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8784180/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claims, the complete specification, or the detailed description; it does not identify any prior-art references beyond passing mentions of U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,569,082 and 5,709,603 and the GTECH "Renaissance Program." It does not detail claim scope, figure contents, or the omitted ticket-embodiment text.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:21 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8784180. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.