Invalidity dossier

US 8661079

Method and apparatus for establishing an invite-first communication session

Current assignee: Qualcomm Inc

Added 9/21/2026, 10:33:27 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US8661079 — Patent Overview

Title: Method and apparatus for establishing an invite-first communication session
Patent number: US8661079B2
Assignee (current and original, per listing): Qualcomm Inc
Application number: US10/371,338
Filed / priority date: 2003-02-20
Publication date (grant): 2014-02-25
Legal status (as listed): Expired – Fee Related; adjusted expiration 2030-05-25
Inventors: David Jonathan Ross; Ravinder Chandhok; Gil Balaoing; Eric C. Rosen
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8661079/en

Purpose. The patent addresses point-to-point and point-to-multipoint wireless communications, where a dormant packet data session must be reactivated, a transition the text says is accompanied by "considerable delay in the system response." It targets dispatch-type services (push-to-talk), whose key feature is that "communication is quick and spontaneous," and where PTT latency is "a critical parameter."

Plain-language scope. Instead of a talker simply seizing the floor, the disclosed approach invites before connecting. Per the definitions section, a method "includes receiving an invite message from an inviter, forwarding the invite message to at least one invitee, receiving a response from one of the at least one invitee in response to the invite message, and establishing a communication session between the inviter and the at least one invitee." A parallel formulation begins from "receiving an input from an inviter who wishes to invite at least one invitee." The excerpt also recites an apparatus comprising "a memory unit, a receiver, a transmitter, and a processor communicatively coupled with the memory unit, the receiver, and the transmitter," where the processor carries out the above methods. Disclosed figures include a group communications system (FIG. 1), device interaction with a group communication server (FIG. 2), a wireless infrastructure (FIG. 3), first and second invite-first call setup processes (FIGs. 4–5), and a group call server (FIG. 6).

What the excerpt does not establish. The supplied text contains no claims, no full written description, no figures, and no cited prior art. It does not establish the number or exact wording of claims, claim scope, the full specification, dependent embodiments, prosecution history, or the accuracy of the listed legal status. No litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis is included or implied here.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:01:25 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8661079. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.