Invalidity dossier

US 8352400

Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-factored interface therefore

Current assignee: Individual

Added 9/21/2026, 9:25:20 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 8,352,400 B2

Title: Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-factored interface therefore

Patent number / application: US8352400B2; Application US13/244,152; publication US20120017232A1.

Inventors: Steven M. Hoffberg; Linda I. Hoffberg-Borghesani.

Assignee: Listed as Individual (original assignee Individual; Google notes assignee listings may be inaccurate and that it performed no analysis or warranty).

Dates (as supplied): Priority date 1991-12-23 (priority claimed from US07/812,805); filing date 2011-09-23; publication date 2013-01-08; adjusted expiration 2012-01-02. Legal status: Expired – Fee Related.

Purpose: The supplied definitions state the invention "relates to the field of programmable sequencing devices, or, more particularly, the field of remote controls for consumer electronic devices," and "provides an enhanced interface for facilitating human input of a desired control sequence in a programmable device by employing specialized visual feedback." The text notes popular programmable products including VCRs, answering machines, microwave ovens, alarm clocks, thermostats, cameras, home security systems, lighting systems, and automobiles. It describes problems such as remote controls with many buttons causing user confusion, under-utilization of buttons, and greater "search time"; the stated aim is to let all segments of the population effectively interface with programmable devices and let a manufacturer produce a single device without regard to a user's ability to learn programming steps.

Plain-language scope (from the source text): An adaptive, pattern-recognition-based controller with a human-factored interface that gives visual feedback to help a person enter a desired control sequence, applied to programmable consumer devices. Classifications listed include fuzzy logic, machine learning, knowledge-based/inference models, adaptive control, and home automation.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8352400/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It provides only definitions and background fragments, not the claims; claim scope, claim language, and the full specification are not established here. It does not establish litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior-art analysis, and it does not establish the accuracy of the listed assignee or legal status.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:02:28 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8352400. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.