Invalidity dossier
US 8037041
System for dynamic keyword aggregation, search query generation and submission to third-party information search utilities
Current assignee: E2e Systems LLC
Added 10/31/2026, 4:01:07 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US 8,037,041 B2
Title: System for dynamic keyword aggregation, search query generation and submission to third-party information search utilities
Patent number / application: US 8,037,041 B2; Application US 11/400,002
Inventor: Puneet K. Gupta
Assignee: The source lists Alden Byird Investments LLC as original assignee and E2e Systems LLC as current assignee; inventor Puneet K. Gupta and Soundstarts, Inc. are recorded as assignors to Alden Byird Investments, LLC.
Key dates: Priority 2005-04-11; filed 2006-04-07; published as US 2006/0230015 A1 on 2006-10-12; granted 2011-10-11.
Purpose: The patent addresses a problem with existing information searching: it is often ad hoc and performed manually, and users may lack skill in choosing keywords and phrases that return relevant results. Poorly chosen terms can return many irrelevant links, forcing users to sift through data and repeatedly refine and resubmit searches, which can be frustrating, especially for untrained users.
Plain-language scope: The disclosed system extracts keywords and phrases from a text source for submission to a search facility. It includes a text source accessible by the system, a keyword aggregation function, and a mechanism for configuring the system; extraction occurs according to that configuration. Configuration can control the nature of selected words (e.g., nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs), selection of repeated words or phrases, prioritization based on date or time constraints (e.g., a course schedule), and extraction by document portion (sentences, paragraphs, pages, chapters). The text source may be a real-time typing mechanism, with extraction managed by word, sentence, paragraph, page, or time periodicity. Submissions may be managed by time periods or structural characteristics such as sentences, paragraphs, pages, chapters, or subheadings, may occur in real time over the Internet, or may occur when a system reconnects after offline extraction. Search results may be displayed proximate typed text and may include links to Internet-connected sources. A corresponding method is also described.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8037041/en
Not established by the excerpt: The full claim set and its exact claim language; the complete specification and drawings; the detailed operation of the aggregation and submission mechanisms; the number or specific content of the figures; and the full text of the background and detailed-description sections. No litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art matters are addressed here, consistent with the source excerpt.
Generated 10/31/2026, 4:01:18 AM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8037041. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.