Invalidity dossier

US 7937380

System and method for recommended events

Current assignee: Yahoo AD Tech LLC

Added 9/21/2026, 3:59:06 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US7937380B2

Title: System and method for recommended events
Patent number: US7937380B2
Application number: US11/615,544
Inventors: Michael Spiegelman; William MacDonald White
Original assignee: Yahoo! Inc. (current assignee listed as Yahoo AD Tech LLC)
Priority/filing date: 2006-12-22
Publication date (grant): 2011-05-03
Adjusted expiration (per source): 2027-05-28; status listed Active

Purpose (plain language). The patent addresses a stated problem: bulletin-board event listings force consumers to sift through hundreds of events, and mailing lists deliver notices that are often irrelevant or that omit events of interest. The disclosed system instead tracks the media content a consumer accesses, purchases, views, or otherwise consumes, and uses that history to notify the consumer of upcoming events likely to interest them.

Scope (plain language, from the supplied text). A consumer profile stores a consumer location and consumption information identifying media content items the consumer requested. An event database stores upcoming events, each with an event location and event data associating the event with media content items. When a consumer requests a media content item (e.g., to render a song or video), the system stores interest data, determines whether the item is associated with an event, and transmits a notification of that event based on the consumer's location and interest data. A user interface module performs the notification, and a graphical user interface displays event data. Aspects are claimed as methods (notifying consumers; recommending events), a system (first datastore of media content items, second datastore of events, third datastore of consumer profiles), and a computer-readable medium encoding instructions.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US7937380](/patent/US7937380)/en

What the excerpt does not establish. It does not include the full claim text, the complete specification (the excerpt is explicitly partial), the figures' contents beyond captions, or any cited prior-art references. It also does not establish inventorship disputes, claim construction, or the accuracy of the assignee or expiration listings, which the source itself labels as assumptions rather than legal conclusions.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:54:26 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7937380. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.