Invalidity dossier

US 7668951

Electronic message source reputation information system

Current assignee: Google LLC

Added 9/20/2026, 5:17:19 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US7668951B2

Title: Electronic Message Source Reputation Information System

Patent Number: US7668951B2

Assignee: Google LLC (original assignee listed as Google LLC; an assignment to Postini, Inc. appears in the record, followed by reassignment to Google Inc. and later Google LLC)

Inventors: Peter K. Lund, Scott M. Petry, Craig S. Croteau, Kenneth K. Okumura, Dorion A. Carroll

Application Number: US11/137,110

Priority Date: 2004-05-25

Filing Date: 2005-05-25

Publication Date: 2010-02-23

Adjusted Expiration: 2027-05-21

Purpose: The patent describes a system for monitoring network activity, creating pools of information reflecting that activity, and managing network activity based on the collected information. Specifically, it maintains a pool of source Internet Protocol (IP) address information—referred to as a Real-Time Threat Identification Network (RTIN) database—that provides the reputation of source IP addresses, which customers can use for filtering network traffic.

Plain-Language Scope: The system gathers reputation data about email senders (identified by IP address or domain) from multiple sources, then makes that reputation information available so customers can filter incoming network traffic. Data sources described include: a traffic monitoring system collecting real-time email traffic information; a "two-strikes" system that reduces false-positive spam identification by checking elapsed time since a prior suspected spam email from an IP address; and a "sudden-death" system that detects spam based on email addressed to known non-existent addresses (an indication of a directory harvest attack, or DHA). The reputation information can be accessed through multiple avenues, including Domain Name Server (DNS)-type queries and router-table data. The patent also touches on authentication processes for accessing reputation information (e.g., encryption keys), types of information maintained in the pool, and methods of access.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US7668951](/patent/US7668951)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied text is explicitly marked as an excerpt with omitted portions. It does not establish the full contents of the claims, the complete specification, the exact scope of the "Active EMS patent application" referenced, or the full details of the authentication and access methods. It does not establish litigation history, validity, ownership transfers beyond what is listed, or prior art.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:02:57 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7668951. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.