Invalidity dossier

US 7574553

Digital component power savings in a host device and method

Current assignee: E2e Systems LLC

Added 10/31/2026, 4:01:11 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US7574553B2 — Concise Patent Overview

Title: Digital component power savings in a host device and method

Patent number / application: US7574553B2, Appl. No. US11/454,493

Dates: Priority and filing date 2006-06-16; publication of US20070294464A1 on 2007-12-20; grant/publication 2009-08-11. Google Patents lists an adjusted expiration of 2027-09-14 (legal status is an assumption, not a legal conclusion).

Assignee: The "Current Assignee" listed is E2e Systems LLC, with Cornice Inc also listed; the original assignee is shown only as "Individual." The record shows assignment entries to Cornice, Inc. (2006-06-16), Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. and Benhov GmbH, LLC (2007), and later to Intellectual Ventures Assets 207 LLC (2026-04-08) and E2e Systems LLC (2026-05-31).

Purpose (per the excerpt): To reduce power consumption of a host digital device by having a component that interfaces with the host monitor the interface itself, rather than relying on host signaling or a poorly tuned drive-side timer to power down a hard disk drive.

Plain-language scope (as described in the excerpt's definitions): A first digital component (embodied as a hard disk drive) shares an interface with other components and with a host that issues commands, some addressed to the first component. During idle time between commands, a control or monitoring arrangement watches the interface for commands directed to that component, drawing only a leakage current (in one embodiment, under 1 milliamp); the component may enter a "coma mode" limited to leakage current. On detecting a relevant issued command, a wake-up signal is generated and an operating arrangement works with the host to execute the command in a normal operational mode. The excerpt names figures 1–6, including flow-diagram FIG. 4.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US7574553](/patent/US7574553)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The full text of the claims, the complete description, the named prior-art references, and the contents of FIGS. 1–6 are not reproduced; the classifications (e.g., G06F1/3203, G06F1/3221) are listed but not explained. The excerpt alone does not establish claim scope, validity, or the details behind any ownership transaction.

Generated 10/31/2026, 4:01:47 AM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7574553. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.