Invalidity dossier

US 7519558

Biometrically enabled private secure information repository

Current assignee: Individual

Added 9/21/2026, 5:44:22 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 7,519,558 B2

Title: Biometrically enabled private secure information repository

Patent number: US 7,519,558 B2; application US 10/245,232; publication US 2003/0225693 A1.

Assignee: Listed as Individual (original assignee Individual; the source notes listed assignees may be inaccurate).

Inventors: Claudio R. Ballard; Amarish Pathak; Michael T. Imbruce; Edward H. Currie; James Cassata; Maurice N. Freedman.

Dates: Priority date 1997-08-27 (claimed from US 08/917,761; also from US 09/454,492, 1999-12-06). Filing date 2002-09-17. Granted/publication date 2009-04-14. Adjusted expiration 2020-06-14; status "Expired - Fee Related."

Purpose: The invention "relates generally to a private system to store and retrieve all types of information with the use of biometrics for authentication and encryption techniques for security." Personal information may include leases, deeds, passports, birth certificates, wills, trusts, driver's licenses, bank/credit information, commercial transaction information, educational and citizenship information.

Plain-language scope: The described system comprises at least one remote client subsystem (receiving/transmitting data); at least one remote data processing subsystem with an encryption subsystem and a biometric authentication subsystem; at least one remote data management subsystem; at least one remote data storage subsystem; and at least one communication network for secure transmission among them. Users enroll by presenting documents to authenticate claimed identity, inputting biometrics and required information at client stations; enrollment biometrics are stored in an enrollment biometric database for later verification. Merchants and commercial users may enroll and act as hosts; the system may also transact with non-enrolled users, businesses, or institutions. Abbreviations shown: ORB (Object Request Broker), AS (Application Server), DB (Database), ES (Encryption Subsystem), DTBS (Biometric Subsystem).

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7519558/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The full claim set, figures (FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 are referenced but not reproduced), detailed biometric/encryption implementation, and the complete specification are not included. No litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis is made here.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:02:33 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7519558. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.