Invalidity dossier

US 7464057

Method and system for multi-currency escrow service for web-based transactions

Current assignee: Citibank NA

Added 9/23/2026, 2:01:30 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 7,464,057 B2

Title: Method and system for multi-currency escrow service for web-based transactions

Patent number / application: US7464057B2; application US10/109,782; earlier publication US20020161707A1.

Assignee: Current assignee listed as Citibank NA; original assignee Citibank NA. The record also shows assignments to Crossmar, Inc. (2002) and Citicorp Banking Corporation, then Citibank, N.A. (2006).

Key dates (as listed): Priority date 2001-03-30; filing date 2002-03-29; publication date 2008-12-09; adjusted expiration 2026-02-15; legal status "Expired – Lifetime." A later application (US12/289,381, published as US7925586B2) claims priority to this filing.

Inventors: Alan Cole, Deborah Bennett, Hachadur Hashasian.

Classification: G06Q, including commerce/buying-selling transactions, payment architectures involving a neutral third party or clearing house, electronic funds transfer/home banking, currency conversion (G06Q20/381), and finance/credit.

Purpose and plain-language scope: The patent addresses escrow service for web-based transactions, including multi-currency transactions. According to the supplied definitions and summary, the invention "relates generally to the field of electronic commerce ('e-commerce')," and an embodiment "provides a method and system for escrow service for web-based transactions, such as multi-currency web-based transactions, that is web-accessible and accepts registrations from exchanges and/or portal partners." In plain terms, it describes a web-accessible escrow arrangement in which a neutral party holds and handles payment between buyer and seller, with support for more than one currency, and with exchanges and portal partners able to register. The listed prior-art keywords are buyer, seller, payment, user, and transaction; KYC ("Know-Your-Customer") appears among the defined terms.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7464057/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the claims, detailed description, drawings, or full definitions; the specification text is expressly excerpted and omitted portions should be consulted. It does not establish the number or scope of claims, the specific escrow workflow, or how multi-currency conversion is implemented.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:35 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7464057. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.