Invalidity dossier

US 7440660

Transducer for heat assisted magnetic recording

Current assignee: Seagate Technology LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 1:00:49 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 7,440,660 B1

Title: Transducer for heat assisted magnetic recording

Assignee: Seagate Technology LLC (original assignee; listed current assignee is also Seagate Technology LLC)

Inventor(s): Xuhui Jin; Chubing Peng; William Albert Challener; Edward Charles Gage; Michael Allen Seigler

Key dates (per supplied source): Priority/filing date 2007-10-16; granted and published 2008-10-21; anticipated expiration 2027-10-16. Legal status listed as Active.

Purpose: The patent addresses heat assisted magnetic recording. Per the supplied definitions, a planar solid immersion mirror (PSIM) lens is fabricated on a planar waveguide, and a metallic nano-structure — a "near-field optical transducer" — is placed near the PSIM focus. The PSIM directs light onto the near-field transducer to form a local surface plasmon (LSP), which is sensitive to the transducer's shape and its location in the waveguide. The near-field transducer may be buried in a dielectric of low thermal dissipation; light absorbed in it creates heat requiring a cooling mechanism.

Plain-language scope (from the supplied claims summary): The disclosure recites an apparatus with (1) a first waveguide that focuses an electromagnetic wave to a focal region, and (2) a second waveguide defining an opening whose end sits adjacent to the focal region. The second waveguide includes a first metallic layer with second and third layers on opposite sides, the first metallic layer having a larger propagation constant than the second and third layers. A further aspect recites a metallic structure defining an opening with a multilayer dielectric structure inside it, including specified wall arrangements. Another aspect is expressed in means-plus-function terms for focusing. Figures 1–21 depict transducer structures, write poles, waveguides, air bearing surfaces, a modeled storage medium, and simulated light-absorption graphs (FIGS. 13–18).

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7440660/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claim text, complete specification, detailed description, or reference numerals; nor does it establish exact claim count, claim dependency, drawings' content beyond captions, or figures 2–21 in full. No litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis is offered.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:18 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7440660. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.