Invalidity dossier
US 7342266
Field effect transistors with dielectric source drain halo regions and reduced miller capacitance
Current assignee: International Business Machines Corp
Added 9/23/2026, 4:03:06 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US7342266B2
Title: Field effect transistors with dielectric source drain halo regions and reduced Miller capacitance
Patent number: US7342266B2 (application US11/306,710)
Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation (original assignee; assignment recorded 2006-01-09, naming inventors Belyansky, Chidambarrao, and Gluschenkov)
Key dates (as listed): Priority/filing date 2006-01-09; publication of US20070161169A1 on 2007-07-12; granted/publication date 2008-03-11; adjusted expiration 2026-03-16. Legal status shown as "Expired – Fee Related."
Purpose: The invention relates generally to semiconductor device processing, and more particularly to a structure and method for reducing short channel effects and parasitic capacitances in field effect transistors (FETs).
Plain-language scope (from the excerpt): The patent addresses problems that arise as FET gate lengths shrink — namely short channel effects (e.g., increased drain-to-source leakage in the off state) and edge effects, notably gate-to-source/drain capacitance. That capacitance includes direct overlap (C_do), outer fringe (C_of), inner fringe (C_if), and gate-to-contact stud (C_stud) components, the first three collectively termed overlap capacitance (C_ov). A portion of this parasitic fringe capacitance can be amplified as Miller capacitance, described as an amplification of gate-to-drain capacitance in CMOS applications. The excerpt notes overlap capacitance can account for as much as about 50% of overall capacitance at a scaled gate length of roughly 30 nanometers. The title indicates dielectric source/drain halo regions are used to reduce Miller capacitance while the device maintains low series resistance between channel and source/drain.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US7342266](/patent/US7342266)/en
Not established by this excerpt: The excerpt is partial and truncated mid-sentence ("...whil"). It does not provide the full claims, the complete detailed description, specific materials or process steps for forming the dielectric halo regions, drawing contents, or the specific structures recited in the claims. It also does not establish the accuracy of the listed dates, inventorship, assignee, or legal status, which the source itself labels as assumptions or non-legal conclusions.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:51:11 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7342266. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.