Invalidity dossier

US 7174282

Design methodology for tissue engineering scaffolds and biomaterial implants

Current assignee: Individual

Added 9/24/2026, 1:07:11 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 7,174,282 B2

Title: Design methodology for tissue engineering scaffolds and biomaterial implants

Patent number / application: US 7,174,282 B2 (application US 10/178,419; pre-grant publication US 2003/0069718 A1)

Inventors: Scott J. Hollister, Gabriel Tien-Min Chu, Juan M. Taboas

Assignee: Listed as "Individual" (original assignee: Individual). No corporate assignee appears in the supplied text.

Key dates: Priority date 2001-06-22; filing date 2002-06-24; publication date 2007-02-06; adjusted expiration 2024-09-27 (status: expired – lifetime).

Purpose: The invention addresses design of biomaterial scaffolds, biomaterial implants, gene therapy delivery systems, in vitro tissue testing systems, bioreactors, and drug delivery/testing systems. The text states that prior approaches either matched elastic properties without enabling optimal microstructures in anatomical shape, or used CT data for customized implants without a specific method for designing the implant interior.

Plain-language scope: The described methodology combines image-based design of pore structures with homogenization theory to compute how effective physical properties depend on material microstructure, then applies optimization to compute optimal pore geometry. The process: (1) create unit cell voxel databases over design parameters; (2) solve homogenization equations for each unit cell to calculate effective physical properties of scaffold and of tissue growing into pores; (3) formulate and solve optimization of unit cell parameters; (4) combine the optimized voxel topology with a voxel dataset of anatomic shape, using density variations as a map for substituting optimized topologies; (5) convert the result automatically to surface or wireframe representation for solid free form fabrication or casting (via marching cubes/marching squares). The stated aim is that scaffold and regenerating tissue match natural tissue properties, with a fixed lower bound on porosity and permeability. Figures show a porous unit cell, a Boolean combination for a mandibular condyle, modulus correlation graphs, and .stl/.slf outputs.

Not established by the excerpt: Claims, full specification, exact optimization algorithms, materials, experimental results, and any litigation, ownership transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis. The excerpt is partial.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7174282/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:31:35 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7174282. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.