Invalidity dossier

US 7099304

Apparatus, methods and systems for anonymous communication

Current assignee: Flexiworld Technologies Inc

Added 9/17/2026, 2:27:03 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US7099304B2

Title: Apparatus, methods and systems for anonymous communication

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US7099304](/patent/US7099304)/en

Bibliographic data (per supplied text):

  • Patent number: US7099304B2
  • Application number: US09/947,116
  • Filing date: 2001-09-04
  • Priority date (stated as an assumption, not a legal conclusion): 2000-09-05
  • Publication date: 2006-08-29
  • Inventors: Christina Ying Liu; William Ho Chang
  • Original/current assignee listed: Flexiworld Technologies Inc
  • Legal status: Ceased, with an adjusted expiration of 2024-04-30
  • Classification: H04M3/42 (systems for anonymous communication between parties, e.g. by use of disposal contact identifiers), among others

Purpose and plain-language scope (only as supported by the excerpt):
The patent concerns anonymous communication. The classification indicates systems providing anonymous communication between parties, for example through disposable contact identifiers. The prior-art keywords listed are "station," "communication," "party," "reference code," and "transaction," suggesting embodiments in which a party communicates via a reference code rather than revealing direct identity details. The listed classifications also cover telephonic exchanges, authorization-code arrangements, digital voice transmission over IP networks, and telephone services combined with data services such as instant messaging and electronic mail. The excerpt states that "the Internet is a collection of computer networks from which users obtain and share information"; other definitions are cut off.

What the excerpt does not establish:
The supplied text is an excerpt and omits the abstract, claims, and description ("consult the source for omitted text"). It does not permit a reliable statement of independent claim scope, specific apparatus components, or method steps beyond the keywords and classifications above. It does not establish the exact priority basis, the number or content of claims, or the scope of intervening family members (the listed reissue/continuation applications are only referenced as priority links, not described here). Per instruction, this overview does not address litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or prior art, and includes no facts beyond those supplied.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:03:06 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 7099304. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.