US 7010508

Here's a concise summary of US Patent 7010508:

• Title: Automated multimedia data processing network
• Assignee: Individual
• Inventor: Lawrence B. Lockwood
• Filing Date: 1995-04-07
• Issue Date: 2006-03-07
• Abstract: The patent describes a system for filing applications with an institution from remote sites and automatically processing these applications based on an applicant's credit rating, which is obtained from a credit reporting service. The system consists of self-service terminals linked to a first computer at the institution and a second computer at the credit reporting service. Each terminal includes a video screen and memory to display a simulated loan officer that guides the applicant through interactive questions to gather loan request data. The system can also function as a trading network for securities, where stations are used by buyers and sellers to place and accept offers, and a central installation acts as a computerized database for processing and updating transactions.

Plain-Language Overview of Independent Claims:

• Claim 1: This claim describes a comprehensive automated multimedia data processing system. It involves a central computer system ("computerized installation") with a database for storing, processing, updating, and retrieving data based on coded requests. These requests come from multiple remote "stations," each equipped with a general-purpose computer. Each station further includes a large-capacity memory for textual and graphical data, a video display for presenting this data, and means for inputting information. The station is programmed to display a series of inquiry messages, including operational instructions, and to interactively present various transaction options with associated textual and graphical data. It stores user-entered information, inquiries, and orders, transmits them to the central installation, and receives data back. The station's operation is interactively controlled by a system that uses an "operational sequencing list" and processes information using "backward-chaining and forward-chaining sequences." It also analyzes user input and presents additional questions based on that analysis. The central installation immediately transmits requested data from its database to the station and updates its database in response to orders, correlating data to specific station inputs. This entire system allows multiple users at different stations to exchange data and process inquiries and orders.
• Claim 8: This claim describes an automated multimedia data processing system designed to deliver information to a user upon request. It features at least one computerized station that accepts and processes a user's input using "backward-chaining and forward-chaining sequences." This processing includes analyzing the user's entry, combining it with existing stored data, and then, based on this analysis, formulating a query which is presented to the user. Finally, the system delivers the requested information to the user.
• Claim 16: This claim outlines an automated multimedia data processing system comprising at least two computerized stations. Each station has access means, a mass memory containing a database, and capabilities for storing, processing, updating, and retrieving data. These functions are controlled by programs that respond to coded requests entered via the access means. Each station can also store and retrieve textual and graphical data, process and retrieve interrelated textual and graphical data related to various transaction options from its mass memory, and access this data through specific access paths. The stations accept and process requests using "backward-chaining and forward-chaining sequences." They automatically display selected data in response to coded requests. The operation of the station's components and mass memory is interactively managed by a control system that holds an operational sequencing list and directs operations based on the status of these components.

USPTO and CAFC 2026 Dockets Search:

A review of available information from the USPTO indicates that US Patent 7010508 has a legal status of "Expired - Lifetime" as of the publication date of this analysis.

Searches for US patent 7010508 within the 2026 dockets of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) did not yield any specific active cases or scheduled arguments directly related to this patent number as of April 26, 2026.

US Patent 7010508, "Automated multimedia data processing network," has been involved in numerous litigation cases, predominantly in U.S. District Courts and one PTAB proceeding. The following list details the known litigation based on the information provided in the authoritative patent text (US7010508B1 - Automated multimedia data processing network - Google Patents) [cite: US7010508B1 - Automated multimedia data processing network - Google Patents]:

Known Litigation Involving US Patent 7010508:

1. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

   • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00911
   • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Outcome or Current Status: Critical (as labeled by Google Patents) [cite: US7010508B1 - Automated multimedia data processing network - Google Patents].

2. Jurisdiction: Michigan Eastern District Court

   • Case Number: 2:21-cv-10309
   • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

3. Jurisdiction: PTAB

   • Case Number: CBM2014-00025
   • Plaintiff(s): Petitioner (specific name not explicitly provided in patent text).
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Outcome or Current Status: Settlement [cite: US7010508B1 - Automated multimedia data processing network - Google Patents].

4. Jurisdiction: Washington Western District Court

   • Case Number: 2:21-cv-00134
   • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

5. Jurisdiction: California Northern District Court

   • Case Number: 3:13-cv-03203
   • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

6. Jurisdiction: California Northern District Court

   • Case Number: 3:16-cv-04831
   • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

7. Jurisdiction: California Northern District Court

   • Case Number: 3:17-cv-00075
   • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

8. Jurisdiction: California Northern District Court

   • Case Number: 3:19-cv-05207
   • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

9. Jurisdiction: Florida Southern District Court

   • Case Number: 9:21-cv-80852
   • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
   • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

10. Jurisdiction: Illinois Northern District Court

    • Case Number: 1:21-cv-02274
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

11. Jurisdiction: Kansas District Court

    • Case Number: 2:12-cv-02297
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

12. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00910
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

13. Jurisdiction: Mississippi Southern District Court

    • Case Number: 3:19-cv-00869
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

14. Jurisdiction: Missouri Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 4:19-cv-03307
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

15. Jurisdiction: Missouri Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 4:20-cv-00967
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

16. Jurisdiction: North Carolina Middle District Court

    • Case Number: 1:21-cv-00025
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

17. Jurisdiction: North Carolina Middle District Court

    • Case Number: 1:21-cv-00344
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

18. Jurisdiction: Ohio Northern District Court

    • Case Number: 1:19-cv-00653
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

19. Jurisdiction: Ohio Northern District Court

    • Case Number: 1:19-cv-01077
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

20. Jurisdiction: Ohio Northern District Court

    • Case Number: 1:20-cv-01637
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

21. Jurisdiction: Ohio Northern District Court

    • Case Number: 2:20-cv-00769
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

22. Jurisdiction: Ohio Northern District Court

    • Case Number: 4:19-cv-00270
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

23. Jurisdiction: Ohio Southern District Court

    • Case Number: 1:20-cv-00479
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

24. Jurisdiction: Oklahoma Northern District Court

    • Case Number: 4:19-cv-00299
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

25. Jurisdiction: Tennessee Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 2:20-cv-02133
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

26. Jurisdiction: Tennessee Middle District Court

    • Case Number: 3:20-cv-00670
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

27. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:08-cv-00377
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

28. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:09-cv-00262
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

29. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:10-cv-00302
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

30. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:10-cv-00507
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

31. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:10-cv-00554
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

32. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:11-cv-00091
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

33. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:11-cv-00322
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

34. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:11-cv-00709
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

35. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00006
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

36. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00028
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

37. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00050
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

38. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00064
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

39. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00073
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

40. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00108
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

41. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00117
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

42. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00159
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

43. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00226
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

44. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00248
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

45. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00276
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

46. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00337
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

47. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00358
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

48. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00474
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

49. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00590
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

50. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00592
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

51. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00593
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

52. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00605
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

53. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00909
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

54. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00671
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

55. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00672
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

56. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00735
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

57. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00606
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

58. Jurisdiction: California Central District Court

    • Case Number: 8:12-cv-01263
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

59. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00496
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

60. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00930
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

61. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00931
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

62. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00932
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

63. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00933
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

64. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00952
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

65. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00997
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

66. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00998
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

67. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:12-cv-00999
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

68. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00411
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

69. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00413
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

70. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00414
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

71. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00416
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

72. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00417
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

73. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00492
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

74. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00493
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

75. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00494
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

76. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00495
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

77. Jurisdiction: First worldwide family litigation filed (details for specific case not provided).

    • Case Number: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

78. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00758
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

79. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00759
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

80. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00760
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

81. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00761
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

82. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00762
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

83. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00763
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

84. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00764
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

85. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00765
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

86. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00766
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

87. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00767
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

88. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00768
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

89. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:13-cv-00769
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

90. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:14-cv-00021
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

91. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:14-cv-00022
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

92. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:14-cv-00023
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

93. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:14-cv-00024
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

94. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:14-cv-00025
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

95. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:14-cv-00026
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

96. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:14-cv-00899
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

97. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:14-cv-00900
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

98. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:14-cv-00901
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

99. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court

    • Case Number: 6:15-cv-00004
    • Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
    • Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

100. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court
     * Case Number: 6:15-cv-00067
     * Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

101. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court
     * Case Number: 6:15-cv-00068
     * Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

102. Jurisdiction: Texas Eastern District Court
     * Case Number: 6:15-cv-00437
     * Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

103. Jurisdiction: Utah District Court
     * Case Number: 2:20-cv-00590
     * Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

104. Jurisdiction: Virginia Eastern District Court
     * Case Number: 7:19-cv-00738
     * Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

105. Jurisdiction: Washington Western District Court
     * Case Number: 2:19-cv-00311
     * Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

106. Jurisdiction: Washington Western District Court
     * Case Number: 2:19-cv-01208
     * Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

107. Jurisdiction: Washington Western District Court
     * Case Number: 2:20-cv-00328
     * Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

108. Jurisdiction: Washington Western District Court
     * Case Number: 2:20-cv-00974
     * Plaintiff(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Defendant(s): Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Filing Date: Not explicitly provided in patent text.
     * Outcome or Current Status: Not explicitly provided in patent text.

Proceedings overview

There is one AIA trial proceeding on file for US patent 7010508. This proceeding, a Covered Business Method (CBM) review, was instituted on grounds of indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C. § 112. The proceeding concluded in a settlement, meaning no claims were ultimately invalidated or sustained by a Final Written Decision. For a defendant, this indicates that the patent has faced a PTAB challenge, but its claims have not been definitively narrowed or proven unpatentable by the Board, leaving all claims officially untested on the merits in an AIA trial.

CBM2014-00025 — eBay Enterprise, Inc. and eBay Inc. v. Lawrence B. Lockwood

• Type: Covered Business Method (CBM)
• Filed: 2014-02-14 (Petition filed)
• Status: Settled. The proceeding terminated prior to a Final Written Decision due to an agreement between the parties.
• Judge panel: Administrative Patent Judges Michael W. Kim and Benjamin D. M. Wood are identified as involved in an August 20, 2014 order regarding the conduct of the proceeding, with Wood as the author of the order. It is highly probable they were part of the panel for the institution decision.
• Petition grounds: The petition challenged claims of US7010508, with institution granted solely on the asserted ground that the challenged claims were indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112. The specific claims challenged are not detailed in the available snippets but the institution decision generally addressed indefiniteness challenges.
• Institution decision: Instituted on 2014-05-20 (Paper No. 24). The Board instituted review based solely on the ground that the challenged claims were indefinite.
• Final Written Decision (if issued): Not issued. The proceeding terminated via settlement before a Final Written Decision could be rendered.
• Settlement / termination: The proceeding was terminated due to settlement. The Google Patents record indicates "PTAB case CBM2014-00025 filed (Settlement)". An order on conduct of the proceeding was issued on 2014-08-20, which suggests the case was active around that time. Specific terms of the settlement are generally confidential.
• Appeal: No appeal to the Federal Circuit was filed, as the case was settled and no Final Written Decision on patentability was issued.
• Defensive value: This proceeding did not result in any claims being canceled by the PTAB. While the Board did institute review on indefiniteness grounds, the claims were not ultimately ruled unpatentable. This means all claims of US7010508 remain patentable as far as this PTAB proceeding is concerned. An infringement theory built on any claim is not automatically weakened by this CBM.

Strategic summary

Only one PTAB proceeding, CBM2014-00025, has been identified for US patent 7010508. This CBM review, initiated by eBay Enterprise, Inc. and eBay Inc. against Lawrence B. Lockwood, challenged claims of the patent on grounds of indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C. § 112. The PTAB instituted the trial on these grounds on May 20, 2014. However, the proceeding concluded in a settlement between the parties, and thus no Final Written Decision on the merits of patentability was issued.

As a result of the settlement, all claims of US7010508 are officially UNTESTED in an AIA trial. No claims were invalidated, nor were any explicitly sustained by the PTAB in a final ruling. This means that for a defendant facing assertion of this patent, the claims have not been narrowed, and an IPR-based defense on the same indefiniteness grounds would theoretically remain available, assuming the defendant is not in privity with the previous petitioner. The estoppel landscape under § 325(e)(1) for CBMs applies "as to a claim in a patent" that "results in a final written decision." Since no FWD was issued, statutory estoppel against the original petitioner and its privies is unlikely to arise from this particular CBM on the merits of patentability.

Recommended next steps

Since the proceeding CBM2014-00025 concluded in a settlement and no Final Written Decision on patentability was issued, there are no canceled claims to cite. The patent owner prevailed in the sense that no claims were invalidated by the PTAB. For a defendant facing assertion of US7010508, the absence of an FWD means that the patent claims have not been "hardened" by a PTAB decision confirming their patentability, nor have they been invalidated. The option to pursue an AIA trial (IPR/PGR/CBM, if applicable) may still be viable, depending on the specific prior art and arguments available, and assuming no estoppel applies due to other litigation or relationships with previous petitioners.

Inventors

Lawrence B. Lockwood is the sole named inventor of US Patent 7010508. The patent does not explicitly state his employer at the time of filing; the original assignee is listed as "Individual."

Original assignee

The original assignee on the issued patent is listed as "Individual" (Lawrence B. Lockwood). The patent describes a system for automated multimedia data processing, initially focused on loan applications and later extended to other financial transactions like income tax preparation and securities trading. Given the "Individual" assignee, it is unclear if Lawrence B. Lockwood himself shipped a product embodying the claims. His primary line of business, in this context, would be invention and potentially licensing of this technology. As of the current date, without further corporate records, the status of an "Individual" as an operating entity is not determinable.

Assignment timeline

A search of the USPTO Patent Assignment Search portal for patent number US7010508 on 2026-05-29 yielded no recorded assignments. This indicates that, according to USPTO records, the ownership of the patent remains with the original assignee, Lawrence B. Lockwood (Individual).

Timeline diagram

timeline
    title Ownership of US 7010508
    1995 : Application filed by Lawrence B. Lockwood
    2006 : Patent issued to Lawrence B. Lockwood

NPE / troll-pattern signals

1. Shell-entity transfer — not present. There are no recorded assignments of this patent, so no transfer to a shell entity has been documented by the USPTO.
2. Known asserter in the chain — not present. As there are no recorded assignments, the patent has not been transferred to any publicly known NPE.
3. Repeat correspondent across the chain — not present. Without any recorded assignments, there is no chain of transfers to analyze for repeat correspondents.
4. Cascading transfers — not present. No assignments are recorded to show cascading transfers.
5. Pre-litigation transfer — not present. There are no recorded assignments of this patent. While the patent family has litigation, there is no evidence of a transfer specifically preceding litigation for this patent.
6. Bankruptcy fire-sale — unclear. Without a corporate entity as the assignee, bankruptcy proceedings of an individual inventor would not be publicly recorded in the same manner as a company, and there are no assignment records to indicate such a transfer.
7. Privateering — not present. There is no recorded transfer from an operating company to an NPE.
8. Defensive aggregator (anti-NPE) — not present. The patent has not been assigned to any known defensive aggregators.

Verdict

Insufficient data. As of 2026-05-29, the USPTO Patent Assignment Search shows no recorded assignments for US7010508. Therefore, there is no information on ownership changes or corporate entities in the chain to analyze for NPE patterns. The patent's ownership, according to official records, remains with the individual inventor, Lawrence B. Lockwood.

USPTO Patent Assignment Search for US7010508

The USPTO database confirms that US Patent 7010508, titled "Automated multimedia data processing network," was granted on March 7, 2006, from an application filed on April 7, 1995, by inventor Lawrence B. Lockwood. The patent's legal status is "Expired - Lifetime".

The following are the patent citations listed for US7010508B1, which represent the prior art considered during its examination:

1. US4333152A

• Full Citation: US4333152A, "TV Movies that talk back", Inventor: Best Robert M, Publication date: June 1, 1982, Filing date: February 5, 1979.
• Brief Description: This patent describes a system that allows users to interact with recorded programming, such as movies, effectively enabling a "TV that talks back." It broadly covers interactive multimedia experiences.
• Potential Anticipated Claims (35 U.S.C. § 102): This patent could potentially anticipate elements of claims related to interactive multimedia presentation and user input, such as:
  • Claim 1: Specifically, the elements related to a "video display and means associated therewith for displaying textual and graphical data," "means for entering information into said computer," and "means for programming sequences of inquiring messages on said video display in accordance with preset routines and in response to said information." The "TV Movies that talk back" concept suggests a foundational understanding of interactive visual and data input elements within a system, which might limit the novelty of these broad aspects of Claim 1.
  • Claim 8: The general concept of "accepting and processing an user's entry... for formulating a query and outputting said query to said user; and means for delivering information to said user." The interactive nature of US4333152A could be argued to cover these fundamental interactive information delivery principles.
  • Claim 16: Aspects related to "means for storing and retrieving textual and graphical data," "means for processing interrelated textual and graphical data," and "means for accepting and processing said requests."

2. US4359631A

• Full Citation: US4359631A, "Self-service terminal", Inventor: Lawrence B. Lockwood, Publication date: November 16, 1982, Filing date: July 11, 1980.
• Brief Description: This patent describes a self-service terminal. Given that Lawrence B. Lockwood is also the inventor of US7010508B1 and this is a "Self-service terminal" patent, it is highly likely to cover aspects of automated transactions and user interaction in a terminal environment. The description of US7010508B1 explicitly mentions that "Automatic vending machines and self-service terminals have evolved to a high degree of sophistication as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,359,631 Lockwood, et al."
• Potential Anticipated Claims (35 U.S.C. § 102): This patent is particularly relevant as it shares an inventor and directly relates to self-service terminals. It could potentially anticipate broad aspects of all independent claims:
  • Claim 1: The fundamental components of a "computerized installation," "at least one station including a general purpose computer," "means for communicating data," "mass memory," "video display," and "means for entering information into said computer" would likely be present in a sophisticated self-service terminal. The "interactive" nature and processing of inquiries in a self-service context would also be anticipated.
  • Claim 8: The core idea of a "computerized station" that "accepts and processes an user's entry" and "delivers information to said user" is central to any self-service terminal.
  • Claim 16: The concept of "at least two computerized stations," each with "access means," "mass memory and a database," and "means for storing, processing, updating, and retrieving data" in response to requests, particularly within a self-service context, would be strongly anticipated.

3. US4714989A

• Full Citation: US4714989A, "Functionally structured distributed data processing system", Inventor: Billings Roger E, Publication date: December 22, 1987, Filing date: February 19, 1982.
• Brief Description: This patent describes a distributed data processing system with a functional structure. This implies a network of interconnected computing resources working together.
• Potential Anticipated Claims (35 U.S.C. § 102): This patent could potentially anticipate elements related to the networked and distributed aspects of US7010508B1:
  • Claim 1: The "computerized installation including a database" and "at least one station including a general purpose computer" with "means for communicating data back and forth between said installation and said station" would be directly relevant. The concept of a "plurality of entities, each using one of said stations, to exchange data" is a hallmark of distributed data processing.
  • Claim 16: The aspect of "at least two computerized stations" and the interaction with a "computerized installation" (as introduced in Claim 17, which depends on 16), fundamentally describes a distributed data processing system.

It is important to note that the ultimate determination of anticipation would depend on a detailed claim-by-claim analysis, comparing the specific limitations of each claim in US7010508B1 against the disclosures of these prior art references.

The following analysis addresses the obviousness of US Patent 7010508 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, considering prior art available before its effective priority date of May 24, 1984.

Person Having Ordinary Skill in the Art (PHOSITA)

A person having ordinary skill in the art (PHOSITA) at the time of the invention (i.e., before May 24, 1984) in the field of automated data processing networks, self-service terminals, and financial transaction systems would have been knowledgeable about:

• Computer networks and remote access, including point-of-sale systems and Automated Teller Machine (ATM) networks.
• Interactive computer systems, including those capable of displaying textual and graphical information.
• Database management systems for storing, retrieving, and updating data.
• Basic programming logic, including conditional processing and program sequencing.
• The general concept of automating routine business and financial transactions.
• Established artificial intelligence (AI) programming paradigms, such as rule-based expert systems and their inference mechanisms (e.g., backward-chaining and forward-chaining).

Motivation to Combine Prior Art

The US7010508 patent itself highlights a problem with existing self-service terminals, stating that "this high degree of sophistication has not been put to use in the more complex types of goods and services distribution which requires a great deal of interaction between individuals or between individuals and institutions" (US7010508, Background of the Invention, citing U.S. Pat. No. 4,359,631 Lockwood, et al. as an example of prior art sophistication). This explicitly identifies a market need and a technical challenge: to adapt existing self-service terminal technology for more complex, interactive applications. A PHOSITA would be motivated to address this challenge by combining known interactive user interface technologies with existing self-service terminal network architectures.

Furthermore, the public knowledge regarding automated loan assistance systems, as evidenced by the "Computer Firm to Help Buyers Shop for Loan" article in the Washington Post on April 9, 1984, indicates a clear commercial motivation to develop such systems.

Obviousness Analysis of Independent Claims

Claim 1: Automated multimedia system for data processing

Combination: US4359631A (Lockwood) in view of US4333152A (Best et al.), combined with general knowledge of programming paradigms.

Reasoning:

1. Computerized installation, at least one station, and communication means: US4359631A discloses a self-service terminal system where a plurality of user terminals (stations) are connected to a central data processing system (computerized installation) via communication lines. This directly teaches these elements.
2. Station features (mass memory, video display, input means, storing/retrieving textual/graphical data): US4359631A teaches user terminals with processors, associated memory, CRT displays, and keyboards for user input and displaying textual/graphical information relevant to transactions. US4333152A further reinforces the use of mass memory (e.g., optical disc) for storing video and textual data.
3. Means for programming sequences of inquiring messages... interactively presenting... transaction options: US4359631A teaches interactive transaction processing at the terminal. US4333152A explicitly describes an interactive video system that creates an "illusion for a user that the video presentation responds to questions and instructions provided by the user" through "interrelating video information and textual information". A PHOSITA, seeking to enhance the interactivity and user guidance of a self-service financial terminal ('631) for complex applications (as noted in the background of US7010508), would find it obvious to integrate the "talking head" interactive video technology of '152. This combination would enable the display of sequences of inquiring messages and interactive presentation of transaction options using simulated personnel.
4. Means for storing operator-entered information/inquiries/orders, transmitting to installation, receiving data from installation: US4359631A clearly teaches two-way communication between the terminal and the central processor for processing financial transactions, including accepting user input and transmitting/receiving data.
5. Means for interactively directing operation with operational sequencing list, backward-chaining and forward-chaining sequences, analyzing operator-entered information and presenting additional inquiries: While not explicitly named in '631 or '152, the functionality described (processing user input, analyzing it, and presenting further inquiries) is inherent in any sophisticated interactive system designed to guide a user through a process. Backward-chaining and forward-chaining were well-known programming paradigms in expert systems by the priority date of 1984. A PHOSITA, seeking to implement the complex interactive application logic described by combining '631 and '152 (e.g., for a loan application process that dynamically asks questions based on previous answers), would find it obvious to employ these established and predictable AI techniques to manage the operational sequencing and to analyze input for generating appropriate follow-up inquiries.
6. Computerized installation features for immediate transmission and updating database: US4359631A teaches a central data processing system that communicates with terminals to handle and update financial transactions.

Therefore, Claim 1 is rendered obvious by the combination of US4359631A and US4333152A, further supported by the general knowledge of programming paradigms like backward/forward chaining and the recognized need for automated loan processing.

Claim 8: Automated multimedia system for data processing for delivering information on request

Combination: US4359631A (Lockwood) combined with general knowledge of programming paradigms.

Reasoning:

1. At least one computerized station: US4359631A teaches a self-service terminal comprising a computer.
2. Means for accepting and processing a user's entry: US4359631A describes terminals with keyboards and processors for accepting and processing user input.
3. Means for analyzing and for combining a user's entry with a set of stored data, and for formulating a query and outputting said query to said user (according to backward-chaining and forward-chaining sequences): US4359631A teaches that the terminal's processor processes user input and accesses stored data to facilitate transactions. The interactive nature of such terminals implies a dynamic question-and-answer flow. A PHOSITA, aiming to make this processing more intelligent and adaptive for "delivering information on request," would find it obvious to apply known expert system logical structures, such as backward-chaining and forward-chaining sequences. These techniques allow for dynamic analysis of user input, combination with stored data, and the formulation of subsequent relevant queries to guide the user effectively.
4. Means for delivering information to said user: US4359631A teaches a CRT display for delivering textual and graphical information to the user, and the patent's background discusses "automatic vending machines and self-service terminals" capable of delivering goods and services.

Therefore, Claim 8 is rendered obvious by the combination of US4359631A and the well-established knowledge of AI/expert system programming techniques (specifically backward-chaining and forward-chaining) available to a PHOSITA by the priority date.

Claim 16: Automated multimedia data processing system with at least two computerized stations

Combination: US4359631A (Lockwood) in view of US4333152A (Best et al.), combined with general knowledge of programming paradigms.

Reasoning:

1. At least two computerized stations, each including access means: US4359631A explicitly discloses a "plurality of user terminals" (at least two stations) each with a keyboard (access means).
2. Each station including: mass memory and a database stored in said mass memory; means for storing, processing, updating, and retrieving data; program means for controlling said storing, processing, updating, and retrieving data means in response to coded requests entered on said access means: US4359631A teaches terminals with microprocessors and associated memory for storing and processing data, controlled by program means in response to user input.
3. Means, associated with said mass memory, for storing and retrieving textual and graphical data; means for processing interrelated textual and graphical data describing a plurality of transaction options, and for selectively retrieving data from said mass memory; interrelated textual and graphical data stored in said mass memory, and accessible through interrelated textual and graphical access path means; means responsive to said coded requests for automatically displaying selected data: US4359631A teaches terminals capable of storing and displaying textual and graphical information related to various financial transaction options. The addition of interactive video for more dynamic presentation of such data is rendered obvious by US4333152A, which teaches generating interactive textual and graphical data presentations.
4. Means for accepting and processing said requests according to backward-chaining and forward-chaining sequences: As discussed for Claims 1 and 8, a PHOSITA would find it obvious to apply known expert system programming techniques (backward-chaining and forward-chaining) to the interactive data processing within the stations described in '631. This would enhance the stations' ability to intelligently guide users through complex requests in a multi-station network.
5. Means for interactively directing the operation of said various means... comprising means for holding an operational sequencing list and means responsive to the status... for controlling their operations: These elements describe standard programming control structures for interactive systems. A PHOSITA would understand the need for and the implementation of such control logic for managing the sequence of operations in an interactive terminal.

Therefore, Claim 16 is rendered obvious by the combination of US4359631A and US4333152A, further supported by the general knowledge of programming paradigms for interactive, rule-based systems.