Invalidity dossier

US 6961346

System and method for converting packet payload size

Current assignee: Cisco Technology Inc

Added 9/21/2026, 1:08:37 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US6961346B1

Title: System and method for converting packet payload size
Patent number: US6961346B1
Application number: US09/449,185
Inventors: Larry G. Michalewicz; Ronald D. Higgins
Assignee: Cisco Technology, Inc. (a California corporation; listed as both original and current assignee)
Filing/priority date: 1999-11-24
Publication (grant) date: 2005-11-01
Legal status (as listed): Expired – Fee Related; anticipated expiration 2019-11-24

Purpose. The patent relates generally to networking and specifically to converting packet payload size, with stated application to Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) and telephony devices.

Plain-language scope (from the supplied text). A bridge receives incoming packets having a first payload size and outputs packets having a second payload size. Each incoming payload section is divided into one or more data segments. Segments from different telephony devices can be mixed to create an aggregate data segment, and a reassembly buffer constructs an outgoing payload section by linking successively generated aggregate segments. Different-sized payloads from different devices can thus be converted to a common size for mixing, then reconverted to the payload size each device expects for transmission back. The text describes the apparatus as including a queue, a payload segmenter, a mixer, and a reassembly buffer, and describes a corresponding method. Stated benefits include enabling conference calls among devices with differing payload sizes, and letting a non-participating telephony device silently monitor a conference call.

Citations. Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US6961346](/patent/US6961346)/en. Figures referenced in the supplied text: FIG. 1 (communication network), FIG. 2 (conference call via bridge), FIG. 3 (bridge mixing differing payload sizes), FIGS. 4A–4B (packet progression through bridge components), FIG. 5 (silent monitoring).

What this excerpt does not establish. The supplied text is explicitly an excerpt with omitted material; the actual claims, full abstract, detailed embodiments, and any prior-art references are not reproduced here. It also does not establish independent verification of the listed legal status, current assignee accuracy (Google states listed assignees may be inaccurate), classification completeness, or exact priority/date assumptions (noted as assumptions in the source).

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:00:52 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6961346. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.