Invalidity dossier

US 6934558

Adaptive omni-modal radio apparatus and methods

Current assignee: ANTON INNOVATIONS INC.

Added 9/23/2026, 6:20:36 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US6934558B1

Title: Adaptive omni-modal radio apparatus and methods

Patent number: US6934558B1
Application number: US09/670,696
Filed: 2000-09-28
Granted/Published: 2005-08-23
Priority date listed: 1993-12-15 (noted in the source as an assumption, not a legal conclusion)
Inventor(s): Joseph B. Sainton; Charles M. Leedom, Jr.; Eric J. Robinson
Original assignee: MLR LLC
Current assignee (as listed): ANTON INNOVATIONS INC.; MLR (A OF VIRGINIA) LLC LLC; SITI-SITESCOM Inc
Legal status (as listed): Expired – Fee Related; adjusted expiration 2016-04-12

Purpose / plain-language scope:
The patent is directed to an "adaptive omni-modal radio apparatus and methods." The excerpt supplies only metadata and bibliographic fields—no abstract, claims, or detailed description. Prior-art keywords listed are "wireless network," "circuit," "user," "modal," and "wireless," which suggest subject matter concerning a radio device capable of operating across multiple modes ("omni-modal") and adapting to a wireless network. However, the excerpt does not describe how modes are selected, what circuitry performs adaptation, or what the claims cover, so any statement of actual scope beyond the title would be speculation.

Family information in the excerpt:
A priority claim is noted from US08/707,262 (1996-09-04; patent US5854985A), and later filings reference US11/047,665 (US7386322B2) and US12/106,738 (US20080274767A1).

What the excerpt does not establish:
It does not establish the claims, independent or dependent; the written description; the abstract; the figures; the actual inventive scope; the identity or content of any prior art; the correctness of the priority date or legal status; ownership history; or litigation outcomes. Per the operating instructions, these are excluded from this overview.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US6934558](/patent/US6934558)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:42:49 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6934558. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.