Invalidity dossier

US 6867110

Separating apparatus and processing method for plate member

Current assignee: Canon Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 10:42:13 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 6,867,110 B2

Title: Separating apparatus and processing method for plate member
Patent number: US 6,867,110 B2
Application number: US 10/152,690
Assignee: Canon Inc. (Canon Kabushiki Kaisha)
Inventors: Kazutaka Yanagita, Mitsuharu Kohda, Kiyofumi Sakaguchi, Akira Fujimoto
Priority date: 2001-05-25
Filing date: 2002-05-23
Publication date (grant): 2005-03-15
Status listed: Expired – Fee Related, adjusted expiration 2022-07-10
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6867110/en

Purpose and plain-language scope (per the supplied excerpt):
The patent concerns a separating apparatus and processing method for a plate member, such as a bonded substrate stack, and related semiconductor substrate and semiconductor device manufacturing methods. The background discusses SOI (Silicon On Insulator) substrates, in which a single-crystal Si layer sits on an insulating layer, and a known technique (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 5-21338) in which a first substrate bearing a porous layer and a non-porous single-crystal layer is bonded to a second substrate, then separated at the porous layer to transfer the non-porous layer.

The excerpt describes separation approaches including pulling substrates apart, shearing or pressing at the bonding interface, ultrasonic wave energy, inserting a sharp blade, and exploiting expansion energy within the porous layer. It cites Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-45840, where a fluid is injected into the side surface of a bonded substrate stack held by a pair of holders smaller than the stack, while rotating it, to separate the stack at the porous layer. The excerpt notes a problem: distortion in the bonded substrate stack or holding it with uncorrected distortion can cause fluid to be injected at a position deviated from the intended separation layer. FIG. 13 is referenced as showing a largely distorted stack being separated at a separation layer.

What the excerpt does not establish:
It does not set out the actual claims, the full written description, or FIG. 13's content beyond the brief reference. It does not establish litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or the state of the prior art. The legal status shown is an assumption, not a legal conclusion.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:33:14 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6867110. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.