Invalidity dossier
US 6859891
Apparatus and method for shadowing processor information
Current assignee: STMicroelectronics Ltd Great Britain
Added 9/23/2026, 2:33:37 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US6859891B2
Title: Apparatus and method for shadowing processor information
Patent number: US6859891B2
Application number: US09/410,606
Inventor(s): David Alan Edwards; Margaret Rose Gearty; Bernard Ramanadin; Anthony Willis Rich
Assignee (as listed): STMICROELECTRONICS Ltd (original and current assignee per the supplied page)
Priority/filing date: 1999-10-01
Publication of US20030115506A1: 2003-06-19
Grant/publication date: 2005-02-22
Anticipated expiration: 2019-10-01; status: Expired – Lifetime
Purpose
The invention relates generally to debugging processors and, more specifically, to shadowing processor information for debugging purposes. The text describes debugging System-on-chip (SOC) devices where internal module communications are hard to access, and where conventional approaches (intrusive register/memory monitoring, debug code on the target processor, in-circuit emulators, logic state analyzers) can disturb memory accesses, slow or pause the processor, consume system bus bandwidth, or yield skewed/missing information. The described approach aims to let the processor provide trace-relevant information non-intrusively, without disturbing memory accesses or the execution pipeline, and at a rate matching the processor's internal clock.
Plain-language scope
A processor and debug circuit on one integrated circuit are coupled by a system bus and a dedicated communication link. The processor transmits bit values representing processor operation states—e.g., operand address, instruction address, instruction value, performance status—and program counter information (including at the pipeline writeback stage), plus branch-type and validity status, address/data/process-identifier information, and match states for instructions or accessed memory addresses. Program counter information may be stored in a (possibly memory-mapped) register in the debug unit, and increment signals may be sent instead of the full counter to minimize communication lines. The debug circuit may shadow processor information (including process identification), provide stall control, and send control signals such as suspend, resume fetch, reset, and exception indication.
What the excerpt does not establish
The supplied excerpt is partial and omits much of the specification and the full claim set. It does not establish claim scope, complete figures/embodiments, or the full list of references cited. Classification and legal-status entries are expressly assumptions/not legal conclusions and should not be treated as definitive. Not researched per instructions: litigation, ownership transfers, validity, prior art.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US6859891](/patent/US6859891)/en
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:13 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6859891. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.