Invalidity dossier

US 6754965

Added 9/23/2026, 8:52:36 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US6754965B1

Title: Integrated sandwich crimping tool

Patent number / application: US6754965B1; application US09/724,271, filed 2000-11-28.

Inventor / assignee: Inventor Len C. Kretchman; original and current assignee listed as "Individual."

Key dates: Priority date 2000-11-28 (noted as an assumption); filed 2000-11-28; granted and published 2004-06-29; adjusted expiration 2021-02-02; status "Expired – Fee Related." Legal status is expressly an assumption, not a legal conclusion.

Purpose: The invention relates to sealed crustless sandwiches and, more particularly, to a tool for forming them. The background explains that ordinary sandwich fillings leak or squeeze out between bread slices, making storage and eating messy; sealed crustless sandwiches crimp the slices together to seal in filling while cutting away interior bread portions and discarding the crusts.

Plain-language scope (from the abstract, definitions, and description): An integrated container crimping and cutting tool arrangement has a tub with an opening providing access to an otherwise surrounded volume, plus a cover mountable on the tub at an opening to prevent immediate access to that volume. A closed wall structure — part of either the cover or the tub, and having two wall-thickness portions — presents an ending edge and a crimping edge offset away from it. Pressing the tool against a sandwich cuts out center portions and leaves sealed bread edges.

Embodiments described: In FIG. 1, a thickened cover wall (14) ends at an undulating edge (15), with a thinned wall portion (17) extending to open edge (16); threads (13, 13′) releasably mount the cover. In FIG. 2, the thickened/undulating/thinned structure (14′, 15′, 16′, 17′) is instead on a skirt of tub (11′). A further alternative forms the skirt as a separate, removable structure pressable onto a tub.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US6754965](/patent/US6754965)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied text is explicitly an excerpt with omitted description text. It does not establish the full claim set, prosecution history, the accuracy of assignee or legal-status listings, validity, ownership transfers, litigation, or prior art beyond the listed classification categories and "prior art keywords" (edge, tub, crimping, cover, closed wall).

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:41:06 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6754965. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.